Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-19868-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14643920B
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Tue, 29 May 2012 09:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 20309 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2012 09:29:13 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20023 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2012 09:29:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 19975 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2012 09:29:11 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:29:11 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fcassia@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.213.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 09:29:04 +0000
Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13so1890141yen.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 29 May 2012 02:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=+8KXGDDK3mqm7YGEXQf3tFK2wWsk6/IqMRVGGX+L0bE=;
        b=GRDm+eyaMBOgJQ3xG35Kf6WmuGE6L/4+P0+W0gWndDUAsCwBZptPBFx8VsgmZVRAki
         f4YegucZQ5EoWlFrOqz14nkAsC8src5nSEVHh3+fHe8A6ZpX8uWxl6RtWDFAJpasiTMo
         QuZKQMiPWiRDumxbSNh/eg/DYT9rmh/yABjUiNT6WIpuKhdFQE+bXFKDHlUNOcLy6Rph
         KWH89I2GesmdnEM5zzLBaiUzk5SZ6SbI2tISOjubRIkjDhH9wSuseFLshTdMaZB5chh9
         b4IvnxfXPdW02K5fq5qfpkPo5ApCuQi5en8wPpqn6veUwnh6cSz0gAVy5lJRv7fEQAti
         cLMg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.140.70 with SMTP id re6mr6535455igb.23.1338283723618; Tue,
 29 May 2012 02:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.60.193 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 02:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FC48DE3.3030502@apache.org>
References: 
 <CALXgTwf0dOoA=KyU74QubTGB99LbOr_N7RXH7mtWxdfGU-QUvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoivxX1YbFzkVVfJ7Rz44PZ4ikCU_0=wSJPvjPJo=maakA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALXgTwf3fXPa_S8gci3MNZ5jC8HCTDN=+Rnm9t72TbiSDXReKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FAB91A6.1070800@apache.org>
	<CALXgTwd0udxHsF_AtE2R3HszA0_ME0JZ0CD1a05Orxe5UjNRKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoh3WR=P0ORZj_02CM2eP4Ef3m3Fa5z=VB8q6mKLbtTssA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALXgTwchVMCvu3JqtP2DRPS9C8BvhdV_-VM-cR6-rizb4phg8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALXgTwftBq9GJ8V7Qu3xxME5qXERxT-vef2em-sCRnCP6hEMKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksogck+2bkRf2TWRU925QFHGrENv2ZJyTP0=uKWC5nSAtdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACGw4H4kpWg=VrWKd5Uy4Jgi7SX_bXOp+z118L+_bh_U8Aq8SA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FC48DE3.3030502@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 06:28:43 -0300
Message-ID: 
 <CACGw4H4CcK=QQ+iGasXz=T+wQBV_DR2bUHw+k4kbuztbt=aMOw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ODF Command Line Tools -- Request for community feedback
From: Fernando Cassia <fcassia@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: odf-users@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f923b9cf477fd04c129755d
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--e89a8f923b9cf477fd04c129755d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) <rony@apache.org
> wrote:

> If possible at all, the base line support should be Java 1.4 as long as
> possible as there are still
> quite a few Java deployments at that level (also 1.5) in the market
> despite Sun/Oracle putting the
> EOL death spell on Java 1.4 and 1.5
>

With OpenJDK available for 1.6 and 1.7, JDK 1.4 and 1.5 are dead as a dodo.
Who will maintain legacy, non-open code?

Plus, Java has good backwards compatibility, I have had no problem running
apps there were created in the days of Java 1.4 with the latest OpenJDK
1.7... but that's just my limited experience on the matter....

Just my $0.02
FC

--e89a8f923b9cf477fd04c129755d--