Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dave2wave@comcast.net
 designates 76.96.27.228 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments,
 and probably correction
From: Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FA836A7.2070905@wtnet.de>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:05:46 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <648F91D7-93CD-4348-AA27-CEE211F55F9B@comcast.net>
References: <4F99DCEA.80608@gmail.com>	<4F9F11D4.6080705@wtnet.de>
	<4F9F1CA8.1080302@t-online.de>
	<CAGj3214ncABOt6B8hQC4BWvX-dhBuk3nZrXFaNJXbEd+0_SGmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F9FBEF1.70403@t-online.de>
	<CAGj32152RxEVeoRx+QrPHyYYVDLZE8-yxVvR1af=z2HDPs5Wdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA38A2D.2020801@googlemail.com>
	<CAGj32153hO4auAY+VfFvCWez0Wt_QZgCCsLf_Jstf2-Kao9siQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA43A74.7030105@wtnet.de>
	<2BB9F9F7-1582-48AD-93F9-102A6624FF7B@comcast.net>
	<4FA48A82.2090901@wtnet.de>	<4FA65A4C.70806@apache.org>
	<4FA66C58.7030209@wtnet.de>	<0669F1D681C3428DA9C5E416AD77A9FD@googlmail.com>
	<4FA69C83.4040804@wtnet.de>	<4FA6ABCE.1010800@googlemail.com>
	<4FA6D93F.2020607@apache.org>	<4FA7A627.5040100@apache.org>
	<CAGj3214Fem3A1fVQ822-6ugmJ2ZUxqHO_E0yOP1OEGb=WwVv6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA7EDA0.20602@googlemail.com>
	<CAGj3216g_0ZVyoCVoxOFi5V2rwFFac2A0ae-OMf_C8s7YCow=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<FE84270C30364B9AADC7DE4DCE419E14@googlmail.com>
 <CAGj3217-NA5pHh5ZTPXriH4CNpX3oHdogap+XLcc+v-L3HswNw@mail.gmail.com> <4FA836A
 7.2070905@wtnet.de>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org


On May 7, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

> Am 05/07/2012 08:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Juergen =
Schmidt<jogischmidt@googlemail.com
>>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Monday, 7. May 2012 at 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, J=FCrgen Schmidt
>>>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> On 5/7/12 5:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Andrea =
Pescetti<pescetti@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On 06/05/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> It's much improved now, but it seems we still miss several files
>>> unless
>>>>>>>> the upload is still ongoing. ...
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> =
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>>>>>> deb_LG.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> =
Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>>>>>> rpm_LG.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> for virtually all values of LG (ar, cs, de and so on).
>>>>>>> All files listed in
>>>>>>>=20
>>> =
http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/checksums_new_****dl.html<
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/checksums_new_**dl.html>
>>>>>>> <http://www.openoffice.
>>> **org/download/test/checksums_**new_dl.html<
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html>
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> are now available. So now there shouldn't be any missing files =
any
>>>>>>> longer.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> OK, thanks for this...the "official" checksums file should now be
>>> living
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/checksums/**
>>>>>> 3.4.0_checksums.html<
>>> =
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html=

>>>>=20
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> I need tomake sure this is the most recent version before moving =
on.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> And, I do think this needed its own page...
>>>>> you mean the checksums have to be on a separate page? Why? Why =
make it
>>> so
>>>>> complicate? I don't understand the reason.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Pleas explain it to me, I am eager to learn ;-)
>>>>=20
>>>> I can't really give you an explanation except to say this is how it =
was
>>>> done in the past. The current checksums page is quite large...they =
COULD
>>> be
>>>> tacked on to other.html I guess, but it just seems cleaner this
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> well a lot of room for improvements. The pages with the centered =
tables
>>> with different widths looks of course not really professional or =
what do
>>> others think?
>=20
> It's not that bad I guess. But sure it would go better.
>=20
> I've also realized that there are no bullet points display when doing =
a list with <ul> or <ol>.

Probably needs some css magic.

>>> I really hope we can revamp the whole page in the future. A cleaner,
>>> simpler design. Consistent translated content with a modern fresh =
design ;-)
>=20
> Sure. However, this needs time. An expert can do it maybe in less =
time. But I'm just a little volunteer in his spare time that has less =
knowledge with HTML/CSS/JS than you with the AOO source code and full =
time. ;-)
>=20
>> I understand. But, I think Marcus did a GREAT job with this in the =
time we
>> had to get this going.  A LOT of work really...
>>=20
>> We do have a lot of changes and considerations for the future -- no
>> disagreement from me there.  Mock-ups would be appreciated. :)
>=20
> Or some links to other websites as reference.

These can be on the wiki that Kay will make. There is a whole range. I =
suspect that there is some hovering magic we can do, but perhaps simple =
is best. Our users don't always have a lot of bandwidth.

More in coming weeks. Great work Marcus, Kay and J=FCrgen and others!

Regards,
Dave

Regards,
Dave


>=20
> Marcus