Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 13:04:38 +0200
From: Eike Rathke <ooo@erack.de>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About the new spreadsheet functions
Message-ID: <20120513110438.GB15361@kulungile.erack.de>
Mail-Followup-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
References: 
 <CAEtvNKd9D7bjkniUebS97nNzfN0i4KuCw3rR77Q95gU0unkJVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FAE6508.7050307@t-online.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FAE6508.7050307@t-online.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Regina,

On Saturday, 2012-05-12 15:26:32 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:

> I think, that the release note is wrong for this functions.
> According to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D90269 the
> implementation was in cws calcishmakkica. But I do not see, that
> this cws had been integrated.

It isn't. It was originally targeted to OOo 3.5, due to 3.4 feature
freeze.

  Eike

--=20
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+vlUYACgkQFbLmO4lpmVrFuwCgmR6/7rzghHP10OtmhHgb5MHc
73cAn0cbIg9jIsszn87Wl2jdW1AEynBC
=fYD0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs--