Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-18688-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C65A596EA
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sat, 12 May 2012 17:47:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 81080 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2012 17:47:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81017 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2012 17:47:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81009 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2012 17:47:34 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 17:47:34 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qc0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.216.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 17:47:25 +0000
Received: by qcso7 with SMTP id o7so2704245qcs.6
        for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Sat, 12 May 2012 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id
         :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=mXLz2gvCBR8ppykOBDr8+UAOYKABmG2wl8Y134tw5tc=;
        b=Ysj09WLjpyzEwiUFG+vvG4K5/PvcgwktfxHCUm95elZDxkP7u3fCpRSJhKRwSkUJA3
         Ym5P4XtwGHnbBR4mFW+AnNCWRBrx8mKcYytqpCeMjh3b04vOPh0+9R5S50mQXSBmMmdL
         Cui3OVPCrYxseMPzBF+xUSwmbyOEP95JLpq5OOoFbjCHS/ZMCHskk5ZRB3GcmIUFaGAa
         uZIo3HaeCmLxKZTMwW6a5snUHwi8d83gNEdV47XT+b8JzpA3BRVx55PUoGSBeZeWKKNz
         WWMv19Mjjm0KcML03hBz4961SBuMoYPLKtJ1rbZsInnGrKTNiiZQp5HTd1EGMDExqKul
         BRMQ==
Received: by 10.224.177.211 with SMTP id bj19mr3667058qab.20.1336844824592;
        Sat, 12 May 2012 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (207-255-220-076-dhcp.cbe.md.atlanticbb.net.
 [207.255.220.76])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i8sm29267356qap.0.2012.05.12.10.47.03
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 12 May 2012 10:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Update release notes ( was: About the new spreadsheet
 functions )
From: drew jensen <drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <4C615A69-B506-4C62-B7BE-DDF73F0A462F@gmail.com>
References: 
	 <CAEtvNKd9D7bjkniUebS97nNzfN0i4KuCw3rR77Q95gU0unkJVg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1336832140.4514.14.camel@sybil-gnome>
	 <1336841039.11695.1.camel@sybil-gnome>
	 <4C615A69-B506-4C62-B7BE-DDF73F0A462F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 13:47:12 -0400
Message-ID: <1336844832.13486.0.camel@sybil-gnome>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 13:38 -0400, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> On 2012-05-12, at 12:43 , drew wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 10:15 -0400, drew wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 14:53 +0200, RGB ES wrote:
> >>> The release notes mention "ODF Spreadsheet supports new Conditional
> >>> Functions": COUNTIFS, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF and AVERAGEIF.
> >>> 
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Well, checked the other functions against the ODF doc spec, it looks
> >> like the release notes
> >> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.0.html
> >> 
> >> should be updated, removing the section on these functions, yes?
> >> 
> >> Will, wait an hour or so for anyone to comment, otherwise I'll go do
> >> that.
> >> 
> > 
> > Done.
> 
> Drew, thanks again. I also want to say that the release notes are very nicely written: informative, to the point. Nice.

They are - not sure who actually put them together but I'd like to say
tanks also.

//drew

> 
> -louis
> > 
> > //drew
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>