Am 05/07/2012 11:05 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>
>> Am 05/07/2012 08:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Juergen Schmidt<jogischmidt@googlemail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, 7. May 2012 at 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
>>>>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/12 5:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pescetti@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/05/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's much improved now, but it seems we still miss several files
>>>> unless
>>>>>>>>> the upload is still ongoing. ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>>>>>>> deb_LG.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>>>>>>> rpm_LG.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for virtually all values of LG (ar, cs, de and so on).
>>>>>>>> All files listed in
>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/checksums_new_****dl.html<
>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/checksums_new_**dl.html>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.openoffice.
>>>> **org/download/test/checksums_**new_dl.html<
>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are now available. So now there shouldn't be any missing files any
>>>>>>>> longer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, thanks for this...the "official" checksums file should now be
>>>> living
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/checksums/**
>>>>>>> 3.4.0_checksums.html<
>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html
>>>>>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I need tomake sure this is the most recent version before moving on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And, I do think this needed its own page...
>>>>>> you mean the checksums have to be on a separate page? Why? Why make it
>>>> so
>>>>>> complicate? I don't understand the reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pleas explain it to me, I am eager to learn ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't really give you an explanation except to say this is how it was
>>>>> done in the past. The current checksums page is quite large...they COULD
>>>> be
>>>>> tacked on to other.html I guess, but it just seems cleaner this
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> well a lot of room for improvements. The pages with the centered tables
>>>> with different widths looks of course not really professional or what do
>>>> others think?
>>
>> It's not that bad I guess. But sure it would go better.
>>
>> I've also realized that there are no bullet points display when doing a list with<ul>  or<ol>.
>
> Probably needs some css magic.

Yes, I would guess either in the "styles.css" or in the 
"exceptions.css". Let's see...

>>>> I really hope we can revamp the whole page in the future. A cleaner,
>>>> simpler design. Consistent translated content with a modern fresh design ;-)
>>
>> Sure. However, this needs time. An expert can do it maybe in less time. But I'm just a little volunteer in his spare time that has less knowledge with HTML/CSS/JS than you with the AOO source code and full time. ;-)
>>
>>> I understand. But, I think Marcus did a GREAT job with this in the time we
>>> had to get this going.  A LOT of work really...
>>>
>>> We do have a lot of changes and considerations for the future -- no
>>> disagreement from me there.  Mock-ups would be appreciated. :)
>>
>> Or some links to other websites as reference.
>
> These can be on the wiki that Kay will make. There is a whole range. I suspect that there is some hovering magic we can do, but perhaps simple is best. Our users don't always have a lot of bandwidth.

You mean this one, right?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Improvements+for+the+download+webpages

> More in coming weeks. Great work Marcus, Kay and Jürgen and others!

Thanks. :-)

Marcus