From ooo-dev-return-17532-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed May 2 07:31:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06BA5C6A2 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 07:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52717 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 07:31:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52646 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 07:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52557 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2012 07:31:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 07:31:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 07:31:33 +0000 Received: by bkcjm2 with SMTP id jm2so198484bkc.6 for ; Wed, 02 May 2012 00:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=Om1P0uRFoP97yKz9CsnQT9RmDiB6ZZfO6qib6Y0o+8I=; b=OLfmVNECYTuTusGyyQW1AN+2ZeWBfzSNstI3dtUJcDYZQTOEHGe7vBkr+qXOOfTE+z DRMzQQAtdoqbAwQK3WY2b8zBrOy3VoZkWDaYfsBTk8d8AsnYyXQq8o6w5fC06VmaQBpK 0ObEDmmJim5APyb92hHnUz55DSxo6rdoglkD74e4VBxbhFhSV+dUxgp6p68RvL5wTfsa Wv3jxWzKToyxfkk91SSL0S4UP+gv4ybhiSJRfxbWn09hhA9Zb+08nrUHB0Oh/GeKwvV2 Dn3s6EtWaRkvhMHetyFiVw7NUoujhqrZ3K+V/gVzgAoIyklb/dHdrTFhjMooszLR1Zs9 VTbA== Received: by 10.204.156.8 with SMTP id u8mr9244607bkw.36.1335943871881; Wed, 02 May 2012 00:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.103] (80.178.146.34.adsl.012.net.il. [80.178.146.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ie3sm1571702bkc.1.2012.05.02.00.31.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 May 2012 00:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA0E2B7.2020702@volo-net.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 10:31:03 +0300 From: Issac Goldstand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RELEASE][CODE]: new tag AOO340 and new branch AOO34 References: <4FA0E13E.4040703@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FA0E13E.4040703@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQloaCreKCh1gsJyiTaWumwzAcN6noMLA7RFxBO+7fNwslPYcJwLP7KKg7tHo0mXFNFSqzk0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cool. Shouldn't tags/branches be created before the vote, though, in the future? That way the voted artifact and SCC will be in sync, and it's clear exactly which revision the vote is happening on... Issac On 5/2/2012 10:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > the final preparing of our 3.4 release is ongoing. As part of this I > have created > > - a tag AOO340 based on revision 1327774 > - a new branch AOO34 based on revision 1327774 > > > Why AOO34 as branch name? > We will continue fixing critical issues (including security fixes) and > will update translations on this branch and will prepare releases on > demand 3.4.1, 3.4.2, ... All this work will happen on this branch and > we will create further tags for each future micro release on this 3.4 > code base. > > Juergen