incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Starting the graduation process
Date Mon, 28 May 2012 20:42:00 GMT
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> wrote:
> On 05/28/12 15:00, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Yes the situation was specifically postponed as a graduation
>> issue, I am not going through that discussion again.
>>
>> I made a concrete proposal with two alternatives:
>>
>> - They are moved to a friendly ftp/http site.
>> - I step down from the PPMC to avoid the community
>> the pain of a -1 vote.
>>
>> Since this is a policy question, I assume a third option would be to
>> clarify the policy?  That might make sense as the first step in any
>> case.
>
>
> We already went through that and it's pretty clear to me. Those

You could be in error.  I hope you acknowledge that as a possibility.
I could be in error s well.  So what either one of us believes is not
really the point, is it?  Thus the suggestion to clarify the policy.

> Category-B tarballs are there in an attempt to work around the
> fact that we are only supposed to be using binaries.
>

The restriction concerning category-b binaries is a restriction on releases.

> No other Apache project is carrying sources and patches to
> MPL'd tarballs in the repositories and, other than the
> configure option, we are giving them basically the same
> treatment as Category-A.
>

We're not including category-b source in releases.  If we learned
anything in the last year I'd hope we learned that this was an
important distinction.

> I won't spend any more energy on the issue but feel free to
> do all the consultations you want, and don't take the second
> alternative as a threat.
>

How should I take it then?

> Pedro.

Mime
View raw message