incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roberto Galoppini <rgalopp...@geek.net>
Subject Re: Performance!
Date Fri, 11 May 2012 17:27:37 GMT
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org
> wrote:

> I believe the correct baseline is neither LO nor Microsoft Office, but
> OpenOffice.org 3.3.0.  And then successive versions of AOO starting with
> 3.4.  It is the performance that this project has some responsibility for.
>  LO and MSO performance are someone else's business.
>

+1

I totally buy your line of thought. Think we should learn from Gillette,
and its 'positive cannibalization', i.e. focusing its marketing resources
on switching its own customers from N-1 to N release. Why that? Because
openofffice _is_ the open source market leader, and the number of actual
users is big enough to play à la Gillette. Anything else is just boring.

My two cents,

Roberto


>
> It is useful to know about interoperability performance cases if there is
> a situation where users of AOO are thwarted by a capacity, functionality,
> or speed issue that matters in accomplishing their work.  That also alerts
> us to areas for us to work on.  But serious quantitative assessment is a
> technical matter and it needs to be focused on our product, not one that is
> not our responsibility.
>
>  - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xia Zhao [mailto:lilyzhao8@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 02:27
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance!
>
> I have replied in private mail list... And now replied here again.
>
> Usually we should have AOO 3.4 performance data before we ship it..... What
> we should do now is building the performance baseline for AOO 3.4, and
> comparing with LO and MS office. Actually we are doing that now, try to
> build AOO 3.4 performance baseline using automation tool proposed in the
> community, that is, GUI+Lib. But it need time.
>
> I'd like give manual performance data for AOO 3.4 first. I have had some of
> the data.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lily
>
> 2012/5/10 imacat <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
>
> > FYI ^_*'
> > Please do not attack any party, or create any FUD.
> >
> > ------- Original mail -------
> > Subject: Performance!
> > Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 23:51:47 +0200
> > From: Armin Le Grand <armin_le_grand@me.com>
> >
> > Nice read: http://tinyurl.com/c24awgq
> >
> > --
> > ALG (iPad)
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > imacat ^_*' <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
> > PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
> >
> > <<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
> > Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
> > Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
> > Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
> > EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
====
This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It 
may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately 
notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message