incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and probably correction
Date Mon, 07 May 2012 21:05:46 GMT

On May 7, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:

> Am 05/07/2012 08:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Juergen Schmidt<jogischmidt@googlemail.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Monday, 7. May 2012 at 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
>>>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 5/7/12 5:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pescetti@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 06/05/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It's much improved now, but it seems we still miss several files
>>> unless
>>>>>>>> the upload is still ongoing. ...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>>>>>> deb_LG.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>>>>>> rpm_LG.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> for virtually all values of LG (ar, cs, de and so on).
>>>>>>> All files listed in
>>>>>>> 
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/checksums_new_****dl.html<
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/checksums_new_**dl.html>
>>>>>>> <http://www.openoffice.
>>> **org/download/test/checksums_**new_dl.html<
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> are now available. So now there shouldn't be any missing files
any
>>>>>>> longer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK, thanks for this...the "official" checksums file should now be
>>> living
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/checksums/**
>>>>>> 3.4.0_checksums.html<
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html
>>>> 
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I need tomake sure this is the most recent version before moving
on.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And, I do think this needed its own page...
>>>>> you mean the checksums have to be on a separate page? Why? Why make it
>>> so
>>>>> complicate? I don't understand the reason.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pleas explain it to me, I am eager to learn ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> I can't really give you an explanation except to say this is how it was
>>>> done in the past. The current checksums page is quite large...they COULD
>>> be
>>>> tacked on to other.html I guess, but it just seems cleaner this
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> well a lot of room for improvements. The pages with the centered tables
>>> with different widths looks of course not really professional or what do
>>> others think?
> 
> It's not that bad I guess. But sure it would go better.
> 
> I've also realized that there are no bullet points display when doing a list with <ul>
or <ol>.

Probably needs some css magic.

>>> I really hope we can revamp the whole page in the future. A cleaner,
>>> simpler design. Consistent translated content with a modern fresh design ;-)
> 
> Sure. However, this needs time. An expert can do it maybe in less time. But I'm just
a little volunteer in his spare time that has less knowledge with HTML/CSS/JS than you with
the AOO source code and full time. ;-)
> 
>> I understand. But, I think Marcus did a GREAT job with this in the time we
>> had to get this going.  A LOT of work really...
>> 
>> We do have a lot of changes and considerations for the future -- no
>> disagreement from me there.  Mock-ups would be appreciated. :)
> 
> Or some links to other websites as reference.

These can be on the wiki that Kay will make. There is a whole range. I suspect that there
is some hovering magic we can do, but perhaps simple is best. Our users don't always have
a lot of bandwidth.

More in coming weeks. Great work Marcus, Kay and Jürgen and others!

Regards,
Dave

Regards,
Dave


> 
> Marcus


Mime
View raw message