incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Incorrect Information About AOO 3.4
Date Sun, 27 May 2012 15:22:57 GMT
Bah.. Drew got ahead of me :-P.

Guy, perhaps you can help us clean this old database?

http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Marketing/entreprises.html#france

just let me know what to drop, I feel like grinding my axe today ;).

Pedro.


On 05/27/12 06:23, Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Hi all,
>
> 2012/5/27 Dave Barton<bmcs@apache.org>
>
>> FileHippo.com is a very popular download site for free software and for
>> many years they have been offering OOo binaries for download. They are
>> now offering
>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe from this
>> page: http://www.filehippo.com/download_openoffice/
>>
>> While this is good for user awareness of our first release, some of the
>> information on that download page is incorrect and in one part totally
>> misleading:
>>
>   There are other problems of this type, for instance, the fr webpage of the
> AOO project :
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/fr/
>
> You will see a link "Boutique OpenOffice.org", pointing to the fr OOo.org
> former store, now in the hands of LibO : http://enventelibre.org/la-mouette.
> You can buy there old articles about OOo.org (remaining stocks) gently
> mixed with the new ones (LibO). They sell also articles for some other
> linked associations :
>
>     -
>
>     April : TDF Supporters : http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/
>     -
>
>     Framasoft, which writes great articles about OO.org :
>     http://www.framasoft.net/article472.html
>
> In this case, the issue is not these associations themselves, which have
> the right to have their own opinion. The issue is, for me, the AOO project
> itself, which not controlls seriously its external communication.
>
> After several (public and private) requests inviting to be careful with
> some links present on the fr website, nothing has changed up to now. For
> me, these things are not to be minimized. I have nothing against a certain
> communication with the concurrent project, but if we will avoid some battle
> in the future, the best way is perhaps to be more careful with our external
> communication.
>
> Of course, this represents only my personal opinion, and has not to be
> interpreted as a direct attack or any perverse insinuation against the
> person who has in the hands the keys of the fr website.
>
> A+
>


Mime
View raw message