incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and probably correction
Date Sun, 06 May 2012 17:16:30 GMT
Am 05/06/2012 06:50 PM, schrieb J├╝rgen Schmidt:
> On 5/6/12 5:45 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 05/06/2012 05:24 PM, schrieb Juergen Schmidt:
>>> On Sunday, 6. May 2012 at 14:19, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>> Am 05/06/2012 01:02 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>>> On 05/05/2012 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>>>> The checksums file is ready:
>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's nice, even though a bit scary (four different verification
>>>>> mechanisms are probably overkill); but this will satisfy everybody,
>>>>> so OK.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, sometimes you will see how it looks not before it's finished. IMHO
>>>> for the AOO 3.4.0 release and a bit later this will be the location for
>>>> hashes.
>>>>
>>>> Juergen mentioned to put the links into the green download box. I think
>>>> this is a good idea and will be implemented after the release. So, we
>>>> will have then the "checksums.html" as fallback.
>>>>
>>>>> I see that many links in that page are broken (e.g., links to Windows
>>>>> builds, to 64-bit DEBs and so on); I tend to believe this is known
>>>>> and/or wanted for the time being, but, if it isn't, just click
>>>>> around on
>>>>> that page and you will see plenty of broken links.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this is known as I wrote already that there are no localized
>>>> Windows builds at all and no Linux x86-64 full install builds, the same
>>>> for the hash files, as you can see here:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/files/localized/it/3.4.0/
>>> I will check it asap later when I am back home. It must be an error.
>>
>> Great. Hopefully enough time to upload them, too.
>
> so the files are now available on dist. It was a tiny typo in my script.

OK, I will wait until they are finally visible.

> A clear pointer or private email a little bit earlier would have been
> great ;-) I simply have overseen it. I thought I had double checked it.

You are right. Sorry for too less visibility.

Please see also my response in this thread to Andrea's post with his 
list. There are some more mistakes.

Marcus

>>> Do you know of more missing files?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> @Andrea:
>> You have checked the links on the checksums webpage. Can you confirm
>> that the hash file for these files only are missing? Or have you seen
>> other files?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>>> I think from here the builds will be distributed to the ASF and SF
>>>> mirrors, right? Hopefully someone is working on this issue. *wink*
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Marcus

Mime
View raw message