incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From J├╝rgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and probably correction
Date Sun, 06 May 2012 16:50:22 GMT
On 5/6/12 5:45 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 05/06/2012 05:24 PM, schrieb Juergen Schmidt:
>> On Sunday, 6. May 2012 at 14:19, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>> Am 05/06/2012 01:02 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>> On 05/05/2012 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>>> The checksums file is ready:
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's nice, even though a bit scary (four different verification
>>>> mechanisms are probably overkill); but this will satisfy everybody,
>>>> so OK.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, sometimes you will see how it looks not before it's finished. IMHO
>>> for the AOO 3.4.0 release and a bit later this will be the location for
>>> hashes.
>>>
>>> Juergen mentioned to put the links into the green download box. I think
>>> this is a good idea and will be implemented after the release. So, we
>>> will have then the "checksums.html" as fallback.
>>>
>>>> I see that many links in that page are broken (e.g., links to Windows
>>>> builds, to 64-bit DEBs and so on); I tend to believe this is known
>>>> and/or wanted for the time being, but, if it isn't, just click
>>>> around on
>>>> that page and you will see plenty of broken links.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, this is known as I wrote already that there are no localized
>>> Windows builds at all and no Linux x86-64 full install builds, the same
>>> for the hash files, as you can see here:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/files/localized/it/3.4.0/
>> I will check it asap later when I am back home. It must be an error.
>
> Great. Hopefully enough time to upload them, too.

so the files are now available on dist. It was a tiny typo in my script.

A clear pointer or private email a little bit earlier would have been 
great ;-) I simply have overseen it. I thought I had double checked it.

Juergen


>
>> Do you know of more missing files?
>
> No.
>
> @Andrea:
> You have checked the links on the checksums webpage. Can you confirm
> that the hash file for these files only are missing? Or have you seen
> other files?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>> I think from here the builds will be distributed to the ASF and SF
>>> mirrors, right? Hopefully someone is working on this issue. *wink*
>>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>>
>>> Marcus


Mime
View raw message