incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Legal question about (re)licensing
Date Wed, 02 May 2012 15:36:00 GMT
On 05/01/12 23:58, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Pedro Giffuni<pfg@apache.org>  wrote:
>> I think you are just trying to find some silly excuse to complain
>> about code that *you* clearly didn't write or own. All the code
>> either from version control or bugzilla was provided by Oracle
> That is not what was said in the ooo-dev list
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAKQbXgCF0b8qtXkF1C_Yryx=EXfww4gX=-+VfkV15K_NNMEMBw@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> clearly your assumption that the SGA extend to everything that one can
> put his hands on does not seems supported by the document itself. At
> the very least there are serious doubt as to the extent the SGA cover
> CWSs and/or random patch from bugzilla that had not been integrated
> into the project prior to the grant.
>

Ugh, well .. I did forget to mention the one key disclaimer in all
this: I am NOT a lawyer. Feel free to discard all my comments.

Pedro.


Mime
View raw message