incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Grignon <kevingrignon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: After AOO 3.4?
Date Wed, 09 May 2012 01:53:13 GMT
Paulo,

I have already made a proposal to refresh the UX wiki and could use your help. 

Let's quickly inventory the pages, note the last update date, and categorize the content.


I suspect we will want to harvest relevant content, archive outdated reference mayerial and
remove irrelevant. These could be the categories. 

Let's create a temporary working page in UX wiki to track this refresh. 

With interest growing in working on our next iteration, let's try and get the clean up done
as soon as possible so we can create new pages to capture our collective ideas for AOO.next.


Regards,
Kevin



On May 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Paulo de Souza Lima <paulo.s.lima@varekai.org> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> I would like to help on this task also.
> 
> In fact, I've been "fooling around" the wiki and there are a bunch of
> outdated information and some of them could be "recycled", others simply
> deleted, some of them could be updated. I was wondering if there is someone
> taking care of this issue. Case not, I would like to help on that too.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> 2012/5/8 Donald Harbison <dpharbison@gmail.com>
> 
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Kevin Grignon <kevingrignon.oo@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Understanding who does what with our product is very important to
>> defining
>>> a product direction that resonates with our users.
>>> 
>>> The user experience team is about to refresh the UX work products on the
>>> wiki. An updated set of user roles/personas is our first step. Existing
>>> data can get us started, then we need to incorporate recent behavior
>>> shifts, including integrated social and mobile.
>>> 
>>> Albino, Louis, Ricardo, would you like to contribute to these user
>>> definitions.
>>> 
>> 
>> I would. User whose professional success depends on publishing to academic
>> and scientific journals is my nomination.
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Kevin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 8, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts <luispo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> On Monday, 7 May 2012, RGB ES wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 2012/5/8 Louis Suárez-Potts <luispo@gmail.com <javascript:;>>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> RGB ES wrote:
>>>>>>> 2012/5/5 Albino Biasutti Neto <biasuttin@gmail.com <javascript:;>>:
>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We have to focus on end users, and seek feedback to research,
>> created
>>>>>>>> polls, and others.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We need to get statistics AOO.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Albino
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Before that, we need to define who our end users are. We need
a set
>> of
>>>>>>> "ideal users" with clear needs: students who do their homework,
>>>>>>> independent writers that use on-line publishing systems, small
>>>>>>> companies that need to create an invoice or maintain a database
of
>>>>>>> supplies...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm curious... are you dismissing the vast numbers who were using
>> OOo?
>>>>> Briefly, more than 95 percent of downloads from the mirrors were
>> Windows
>>>>> users. But major deployments were almost entirely in the public
>> sector.
>>>>> Some of the more obvious were listed here [0], but the page is out of
>>> date.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All those groups have different needs, and the right answer for
one
>>>>>>> group could be a problem for the others.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think that, as was suggested, an effective modus operandi is to
>> work
>>>>> with the NL groups. For instance, there might be public sector or
>>> private
>>>>> needs for accessibility features. We here may not have the people to
>> do
>>>>> that but we (an extended we at this point) can work with those wanting
>>> it
>>>>> to find the developers....
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> louis
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [0]
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Ricardo
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry, but I cannot understand your question. I'm not dismissing
>>>>> anything. I just commented that a home user is not the same than a
>>>>> professional writer, and that both groups have different needs that
>>>>> ask for different solutions. Building usage statistics without
>>>>> considering the differences between users can lead to wrong
>>>>> conclusions: that's all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe is for my professional background, but as physicists I know that
>>>>> before doing research (and analysing user statistics is research) you
>>>>> need a "model" of what you are looking for: on this case, a set of
>>>>> "ideal users" with a lists of needs and problems. Only then you will
>>>>> be able to find solutions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Ricardo
>>>>> 
>>>> Well, as a historian I quite agree with you. My point was that we
>> already
>>>> have a lot of data, as that URL hints.
>>>> Louis
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paulo de Souza Lima
> Técnico em Eletrônica e Administrador
> http://www.pasl.net.br
> http://almalivre.wordpress.com
> Curitiba - PR
> Linux User #432358
> Ubuntu User #28729
> 
> "Para que as pessoas conquistem a paz em suas relações, a paz espiritual e
> a paz entre os povos, é preciso que antes se ganhe a batalha interna das
> virtudes sobre os defeitos" - Talal Husseini - Filósofo Acropolitano
> 
> "For people to achieve peace in their relationships, spiritual peace and
> the peace among people, it's necessary, earlier, to win the internal battle
> between virtues and defects" - Talal Husseini - Acropolitan Philosopher

Mime
View raw message