incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Separation of Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese
Date Tue, 08 May 2012 19:00:38 GMT

On May 8, 2012, at 11:34 AM, imacat wrote:

> 於 2012年05月08日 19:36, Rob Weir 提到:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:02 AM, imacat <> wrote:
>>>   FYI, I found that is a redirection to
>>> now, which then separates into two
>>> directory trees.  The uniformed Chinese site does not exists.  The
>>> content is already separated.  Keeping a uniformed Chinese entry page
>>> does not make sense anymore.
>> Look at it also from the directory layout perspective:
>> Each language is a subdirectory of /ooo-site/trunk/content
>> We already have an example of similar differences.  For example we
>> have both a Portuguese website (/pt) and a Brazilian Portuguese
>> website (/pt-br).
>> So it sounds like you would do this;
>> 1. create a new directory, content/zh-tw
>> 2. svn copy the existing content from the old directory to the new directory
>> 3. work on that content until it is ready to publish
>    Hmm...  Currently they are actually two directory trees:
>    So I would prefer to strip the /zh/news/ parts, and keep them as two
> equal directory trees.  Maybe keep the /zh/index.html, which redirects
> people to the new location according to their Accept-Language header,
> and provide choices if both zh-tw and zh-cn do not appear in user's
> Accept-Language header.
>    I think the issue is not to separate zh-tw from zh, but to separate
> existing zh-tw and zh-cn.  This is different from pt and pt-br.

Yes. There should be these actions.

(1) svn move (or copy) from zh/new/zh_tw to zh-tw
(2) svn move (or copy) from zh/new/zh_cn to zh-cn

(3) both sites then get brand.mdtext and topnav.mdtext which can be customized to Chinese.

>> 4. Enter a JIRA issue requesting Infrastructure team to create a
>> subdomain that points to content/zh-tw
>    As they are merely redirection, I do not think it is necessary to
> create new virtual hosts only for redirection.

Not a big deal to ask. What will users do? and

>> 5. Maybe also ask Infra to redirect requests from the old site to the new site
>    Good idea. ^_*'  Thank you.  should redirect to  should redirect to should redirect to that offers
the choice as now.


> -- 
> Best regards,
> imacat ^_*' <>
> PGP Key
> <<Woman's Voice>> News:
> Tavern IMACAT's
> Woman in FOSS in Taiwan
> Apache OpenOffice
> EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan

View raw message