Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 906B6925C for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27036 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 18:25:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26974 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 18:25:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26964 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 18:25:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:25:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave2wave@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.56 as permitted sender) Received: from [76.96.30.56] (HELO qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:25:04 +0000 Received: from omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uJMP1i00X0lTkoCA6JQjPU; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:24:43 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.74] ([67.180.51.144]) by omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uJQi1i00L36gVt78QJQiHa; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:24:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a graphic modification Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Dave Fisher In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:24:42 -0700 Cc: Nancy K Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <53067431.219096.1333613693156.JavaMail.open-xchange@com4.strato.de> <1333647662.2128.YahooMailNeo@web162104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Apr 5, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Michael Acevedo wrote: > Hi Nancy, >=20 > The source file is in .psd. Would Apache want those as well? Yes, please! And thank you! Regards, Dave >=20 > On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Nancy K wrote: >=20 >> Wonderful! If Michael has the .psd or .ai vector original file, and = we can >> all access it later, that will help us resize it without the = fuzziness - >> and make further changes. >>=20 >> I found the .psd and .ai feather file under apache.org/images >> http://www.apache.org/images/ if that will be helpful later in any >> redesign. Is there a /image >>=20 >> It would be nice to add a dimension to the .jpg/.gif/.non-vector = image >> file name instead of 'small' 'wide' - I would suggest a width - = something >> like nameOfImage100px.jpg. >>=20 >> I am new - but noticed openoffice.org/images file and a cujrent = folder >> for logos - good organization! >> Nancy >>=20 >> Nancy Web Design >> Free 24 hour pass to lynda.com. >> Video courses on SEO, CMS, >> Design and Software Courses >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ________________________________ >> From: Michael Acevedo > >> To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org " < >> ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 10:26 AM >> Subject: Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a = graphic >> modification >>=20 >> Hello all members, >>=20 >> It's Michael Acevedo, I am away from the computer that holds the = files >> right now but I do have the original files if you need them. Where = should I >> send them? >>=20 >> Otherwise, I am deeply honored by having Apache selecting the my logo = for >> OpenOffice. >>=20 >> Please let me know. >>=20 >> On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Kay Schenk wrote: >>=20 >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Guillaume Fernandez (Club) < >>>> guillm.frndz@club.fr> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I think that kevin's changes are very important. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> 1) The looks is indeed more profesionnal. The capitalization has >>> enhanced >>>>> the >>>>> natural readability of the logo. >>>>> The kerning is better while somewhat a little dense (intermediate >>>> position >>>>> would >>>>> be great). >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> 2) The look of the main webpage is crucial : we absolutly have to >> get a >>>>> professional look and in my opinion this is not the case today. >>> because >>>>> of the >>>>> JPEG quality and resolution (blurred image). We should improve the >>>> quality >>>>> of >>>>> the JPEG (or use a non-destructive PNG). >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>> +1. When I voted in favor of that logo I assumed that was just an >>> example >>>> rendering and that we had the SVG source for it, so we could scale = it >> to >>>> other sizes. If we do not have these sources, then I don't think = the >>> logo >>>> will work. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Guillaume >>>>> (I am a new suscriber here at ooo-dev). >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hi Kevin, >>>>> On 04.04.2012 05:55, Kevin Grignon wrote: >>>>> Kay et al. >>>>> I can help here. I have the skills and the tools. >>>>> Beyond getting the right size, I'd like to propose a few other = small >>>> tweak >>>>> to >>>>> the rendered logo. My proposed enhancements don't change the voted >> and >>>>> approved >>>>> concept, rather, they merely some polish to the concept as we move >>>> towards >>>>> production consumption. >>>>> See proposed enhancements: 4. Enhancements to Selected Logo = Concept >>>> (Kevin >>>>> Grignon - started 2012-04-04) >>>>> = https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals >>>>> = >>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I like the change of "Apache" to gray but am not so sure about its >>>>> capitalization. I understand the reason (after you pointed it out = to >> us >>>>> non-artists :) though. >>>>> The kerning looks more homogeneous but somewhat dense. For example >> the >>> i >>>>> and c >>>>> in Office seem to almost touch. >>>>> Regards, Andre >>>>> I'll need to access the source files. >>>>> Regards, Kevin >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kay Schenk = wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Dave Fisher >>> wrote: >>>>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> On 04/03/2012 03:46 PM, drew jensen wrote: >>>>> Maybe one of should drop Michael Acevedo a note, see if he already >> has >>> a >>>>> source >>>>> file handy - xcf, svg. >>>>> If not - I don't know of a svg (or any vector based) file for the = bug >>>> part >>>>> of >>>>> the image - I know how to recreate one properly from the 256px png >>> image >>>>> and >>>>> wou >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Best, > Michael