Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <006001cd1cf6$8cdfeb70$a69fc250$@acm.org>
References: 
 <CAH8uTgEjGdRh6==tT8dbP+AeGvtMZ7bPK5BPiZNJC-KXEk0O-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8DFD70.5080809@googlemail.com>
	<006001cd1cf6$8cdfeb70$a69fc250$@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:38:05 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksojXvi5-VQwOkuR4qz2QOSZhCCP8_ebxcG-2_H+2dxzRrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Has the AOO 3.4 RC been released?
From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason why the developer snapshots, r1325589, the same files=
 as currently linked as RC1 candidates, can't simply be used under the cond=
ition that they are not yet releases but are essentially feature-frozen and=
 stable (but for any last-minute show-stopper bugs)? =C2=A0They should not =
be redistributed or placed in product yet, of course.
>

Dennis, this has been true for dev snapshots for the last month now.
Many of us have been using them in our daily work.

> I.e., aren't these worthy of QA and exercising as suitable for upgrading =
of OpenOffice.org 3.3.0: <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUS=
ERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots>?
>

Ditto for QA.  That's where the bug reports have come from -- people
using the dev snapshots.

-Rob

> =C2=A0- Dennis
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J=C3=BCrgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischmidt@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 16:32
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Has the AOO 3.4 RC been released?
>
> On 4/17/12 8:35 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if the AOO 3.4 Release Candidate is now available for
>> download? I see an entry in the Wiki that says so.
>>
>> Many Thanks
>>
>
> The RC will be announced here on the list at least. The wiki was
> prepared already but we have found a further issue with a placeholder in
> the NOTICE file.
>
> Juergen
>