Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72C4DC689 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52642 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2012 14:25:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52588 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2012 14:25:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52579 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2012 14:25:50 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:25:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:25:50 +0000 Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so1311951vbb.6 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:25:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.95.20 with SMTP id dg20mr12759370vdb.5.1335623149703; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.118.147 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:25:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F9BF5F5.60401@apache.org> References: <4F9BCD21.8060103@apache.org> <4F9BF5F5.60401@apache.org> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:25:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pages in the social media From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrot= e: > Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >> I am not sure what you mean by time is running out. Even if release >> date approaches there is no deadline to talk strategy and a good tool >> to manage more than publish. > > > When OpenOffice 3.4 is released, it is very likely that the press release= s > will contain links to the "main" or "official" Apache OpenOffice channels= ; > it wouldn't make sense to change them later and it is obvious that we can > advertise only channels that are under control of several PPMC members. > But the official ones are already set up. We've already had this discussion. The accounts are set up and they have already been shared with the PPMC . We already have several PPMC co-authors on them. They are already linked to on the website. Announcements have already gone out to ooo-announce. They are already in the AOO 3.4 announcement draft. Content is going out on these channels, from the PPMC, on a daily basis. This is all already done, in preparation for the AOO 3.4 launch. This isn't about personal control. This is about sharing. Those who hoard will be passed by and left behind. Those who work through the process and openly share and enable others with see their initiatives succeed. It is that simple. You cannot control by withholding. If you (or any other PPMC member) would like to be added as a co-author to the Twitter or Google+ account, please let me know and I will add you immediately. If you want to be an author on the Facebook group, talk to Raphael. > At that point, everybody, from the PPMC or not, will still be welcome to > open a channel dedicated to OpenOffice (respecting the trademark policy), > but these channels would be "secondary" or "unofficial". > > Regards, > =C2=A0Andrea.