Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-17385-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7924B9586
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 29641 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2012 17:21:32 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29583 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2012 17:21:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29572 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2012 17:21:32 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:21:32 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.217.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:21:25 +0000
Received: by lbbgo4 with SMTP id go4so1980493lbb.6
        for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=V/O+Kl1lV6PBhBk83GC9ePehwOcXR3JMNO7c2MXzuCU=;
        b=h0IoFvGTATbNtWeBOdibEvtMgIKPSrieonoqfkDlCHen+MtsmzyAv6XQgBQeyZJV+v
         emYSy8vZvtnzNNX0NQgNmI0Exmz8DNM+dGrUJ02X8+uN9P24FmLnuXbNluzH1TlQruxR
         Mz/cIUQx43WRux7gAsCpmFbnM12XA6ozpfEnNFbbd2JYOkaNwUSM+LrMQSBrGVZ5wBkD
         WdhE8yTnkvw+buJWfuQJfZj73kBF/UMLzlPU1cDQVmySppm7vj27NgSME9yX0N3l3KGW
         FdFfFNsOnsxYwVX7jBjEgpq/DKVsGLy343BOS+S5i1Ifl7xfPxFb/m5soegC3QtXLhLz
         T5ZQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.36.163 with SMTP id r3mr842683lbj.87.1335806464390; Mon,
 30 Apr 2012 10:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.99.162 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksojzRb-Z0d2AWF4-yL6khm0uq7dj6GcHF8XWe3sBZY1=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F9A860F.1070800@googlemail.com>
	<CAGj32142PsRs-poTSnr8h6A3=3mYDQWehZA-kAkqkyjSBZhP8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F9AEA44.7020706@googlemail.com>
	<4F9AEF84.1090203@wtnet.de>
	<B57F0349-7AA2-462D-803E-78611DE38D92@comcast.net>
	<4F9AF7D4.4030708@wtnet.de>
	<4F9AFCE7.4040303@gmail.com>
	<4F9E3B4C.9040403@googlemail.com>
	<CAGj3215JT00bMEkHb9wq=BWiDDxQOm0eWWrz3mW8E2A77_ZxBw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGj3216DLBgmkBnqUSb5Pr85tDfHJ3mKRx3yyeUT8crQAjv-fg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksojzRb-Z0d2AWF4-yL6khm0uq7dj6GcHF8XWe3sBZY1=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:21:04 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAGj32159c1STYqseQFh703e9qa=6GXvz1xS5Z0w2C2eg-1bLcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: proposed directory structure on dist
From: Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b390f79fecc769b04bee8adeb
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--485b390f79fecc769b04bee8adeb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Right now I have the DL friendly script setup to only use SF...which is
> > setup in the "old" way. I don't think we'll be usign Apache for pre-build
> > client downloads.
> >
> > So, I have a question -- who will be setting up the SF packs and will
> they
> > just stick with the current structure on that system for DLs --
> >
> > i.e.
> >
> > <root>/files/stable/<version>/
> > <pack name>
> >
> > and
> >
> > <root>/files/localized/<language>/<version>/<pack name>
> >
> > I'm hoping the answer is "YES".
> >
>
> Whatever we do, let's try to get a directory schem that works now and
> for AOO 3.4.1 and AOO 3.5 and for AOO 4.0, etc..  This is not
> something where it will be easier to clean up later.
>
> Thinking ahead, what do we do when we have a new release, like a
> 3.4.1?  And what can we do now to make that future less painful?
>
> -Rob
>

Well, for me anyway (I can't address the machinations of setting this up
for actual upload), right now it's a matter of getting what we need to do
to work in the next day, hopefully. I have other commitments later in the
week, and well, I would like to get to a conclusion on this.

This will also effect the links in the new "other.html" as well.

(I think given all this I need to split "other.html" from the new
download/index.html and let someone else work on "other". I'm kind of
getting into a time crunch.)

This being said, maybe the version-centric approach Jurgen has suggested
from his most recent post and Marcus suggested (I think) makes sense...

Again, since all the scripting will be directed to SF, I just need to know
what we're doing. The change to make this happen is not horrendous,
but....things need to be tracked down in several places.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you
 And life has a funny way of helping you out
 Helping you out."
                            -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette

--485b390f79fecc769b04bee8adeb--