Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B779D9ACA for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9473 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2012 12:20:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9134 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2012 12:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9113 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2012 12:20:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:20:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luispo@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:20:10 +0000 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so470191wib.0 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:19:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Ec6f2RmpF9K/cxDoduaXazzMgeLJpc7XjMlrukfd+Jg=; b=LVWRPaF9JtOAkKmkZayS86VIwzLRfSI2Y8SWUFZKzIMZ268IMzVXxXGV28xmbZuSH/ yXEIG4QTUiGyYuosKnr1s6WSESjrHuwNx4M0Q9ZdQukTnLc/4oEAlZXnF2bb5mx7/u1M f6gAhKSbCVrGBTFx5FUkpk7G6G7KfbQ+j+H3b7VjzuKStoK3fxQ9j6Pl6yj8wnMnTUNB //HrxX17Hpfg5r/SlNL+3WvjciX0YwFpko1Lka+UUf1Exw1q2CgI245OcLvdmfPSfVw6 SamHlHuWT7xw46PU83226m+EPv28sULjiX5ialn/KnKnwFqjaEQGoTS6DnhHSv6PvIu4 2hTg== Received: by 10.180.96.228 with SMTP id dv4mr7593436wib.14.1334924389053; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.254.243] ([213.246.197.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm8177480wiv.11.2012.04.20.05.19.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_rollApp_Launches_Free_Beta_=93OpenOffice_?= =?windows-1252?Q?on_iPad=94_Cloud-Service?= From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Louis_Su=E1rez-Potts?= In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:19:45 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2012-04-20, at 13:36 , Rob Weir wrote: > This was mentioned in the ODF Plugfest today, in Louis's presentation, > an interesting use of OpenOffice configured to run on the iPad: >=20 > = http://blog.rollapp.com/2012/04/rollapp-launches-free-beta-openoffice.html= >=20 > Rather than recompiling for a tablet, it looks like they are taking a > remoting approach with virtualized UI. This allows them to run apps > like OpenOffice unmodified. >=20 > -Rob Thanks, Rob, for mentioning this. The basic fact is that we need to have = ODF on the mobile, iOS or Android or whatever, as there is no realistic = alternative to the billions coming to computers over the next decade, if = not sooner. My presentation, which I'll send to the ODF site, argued that tablets = and the like are requisite because they use less resources in comparison = to desktops. As at present native apps able to edit ODF on the tablet = are not too visible (to a degree they exist or will emerge into the = light soon) and even when they do emerge might require, at least for the = current period, more powerful and thus more costly and hotter machines, = "Cloud" solutions (Web software services) coupled with thin clients = (read: tablets) seems the best "interim" solution (as Ross states in = another threaded email). But this is also the way things are going, to = the happiness, no doubt, of former Sunnies: network is the computer, eh?=20= =46rom an open source development perspective, there are logistical = issues here but again none is particularly problematical, as long as = those wanting to collaborate have a way of doing that and know they do. -louis