Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27914CB20 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17807 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2012 14:16:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17717 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2012 14:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17709 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2012 14:16:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:16:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 213.209.103.7 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.209.103.7] (HELO smtp2.wtnet.de) (213.209.103.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:16:32 +0000 X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.106.163 Received: from f9.linux (pop8-672.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.106.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.wtnet.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3TEGEeH017903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:16:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4F9D4D2B.2010000@wtnet.de> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:16:11 +0200 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: After AOO 3.4? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 04/28/2012 06:32 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > I'm already starting to get questions on what we'll be doing after AOO > 3.4 is released. Based on previous conversations on this list, I'm > able to speak confidently about a few things: > > 1) We'll probably graduate to a Top Level Project > > 2) IBM says they will contribute Symphony source code after 3.4 is released > > 3) We have some initial feature ideas for AOO 4.0 on the wiki: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Feature+Planning > > 4) We also have some ideas listed for an AOO 4.1: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Feature+Planning > > Beyond that, do we have anything to say? > > I've heard some discussions that we might want an AOO 3.4.1, which would: > > A) Add some additional translations > > B) Fix any important bugs that are found in AOO 3.4 > > C) Uncertain if it would have new features? > > What time frame would this be? It seems like it takes around 4-6 > weeks to iterate on dev builds, do regression testing, cut a Release > Candidate, have a two-stage release vote and get the new build > distributed. So it seems it would need to be at least that far out, > plus whatever time it takes to do the translations and bug fixing. If I can make a wish then it would be the following: In the 3.4 branch we should go on with fixing more bugs and integrate new/improved localizations. Then we can name it AOO 3.4.1. Release would be as soon as we can agree that the needed bugs are fixed and the then supported languages are done. In parallel on trunk we can do more new things like integrate more (feature) CWSs from the old project, cleanup more license things, push the gbuild transition etc. At the end it would be an AOO 3.5.0. Release could be in summer time (in Australia it would be winter, I guess ;-) ). What do others think? Marcus > Does anyone want to start a wiki page for AOO 3.4.1 and start > collecting proposed translations and bugs for that release?