Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D7159719 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38182 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2012 22:26:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37944 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2012 22:26:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37936 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2012 22:26:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:26:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 66.94.236.137 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com) Received: from [66.94.236.137] (HELO nm22-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.94.236.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:26:48 +0000 Received: from [66.94.237.127] by nm22.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Apr 2012 22:26:27 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.50] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Apr 2012 22:26:27 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp103.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Apr 2012 22:26:27 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 480790.35889.bm@smtp103.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: qbNMScoVM1lY0AO76_9gxFeIMERjXS1RgvDOlvJw1W4xud6 hLOJUJn7NJmCF3vkFBOIZ9qgthyPFauPPenRDiwJ0RaepYzOQhg.NYeY.sOP OyjRnpUlgVQ84Mi4Kqv5DRnmh05haryGU_wtLROpFeuqefplVX.3WXiyxSn_ sUIxVF2p8ffkbL83BeLMX6INN1Q68NLKLTENGfcMaSWV4uaKG1VOHHMWvxJB 49bo6_8SarlTotDYgvgWZX0Yk0YiVx9_Dexs1cpHNRcNOuILFHuEZfRSkSHV VHU6g4AsY.5AZdmTbW6qR.4hw2lWNzdU33UV15Sw2J8kwIpqBglwZmIJCzhG 1Rx47SP0409.jRfe8HRtqbsiv6ZVTX3SWHoSXNUhhqEs6TI_pWU4THeA8b0U xFrQhwEJH4aPry_Os2YHgBE0aWQTuibn.DZrPM3wWpVabaW_PllzrtjFN9O6 iXCNI_NLjl8nD0LkawlrdeBMUNBG9rDMrGbkfL.4LsQeKlvQ.5eyLy.Jk2HZ R2tRRhEUupM76gmADNnw9NdaetHv_fx4217DtJLmxX_ge4q6TGzvipiHv5mw 8e.7NPNldjrLF3n1GuohPfZfu_8zJ2TAmFxtcJn5FyhXTKQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: dHt73eiswBAYjuZ6oL.TTjbe.KQkAIve Received: from [192.168.1.101] (kay.schenk@67.117.30.107 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2012 15:26:27 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4F9B1C21.60701@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:22:25 -0700 From: Kay Schenk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120328 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and probably correction References: <4F99DCEA.80608@gmail.com> <4F9B0213.5020304@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04/27/2012 01:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> Please take a look at and give feedback on a test page for the new >>> /download/index.html page at: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html >>> Yes, it's a bit strange with lots of nonsense at the top that I wanted >>> you to see, but will of course go away in production. >> >> >> The page is nice, but it's the concept that leaves me dubious. >> >> We have another thread >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel/16219 >> where there seems to be consensus towards a solution that: >> 1) Uses SF (and possibly Apache) for the web-based downloads >> 2) Does not phase out MirrorBrain, and uses it for the updates (i.e., >> downloads initiated by OpenOffice with the "Look for updates" function) >> > > That's what I understand as well. oh -- OK. I thought we were going to use MirrorBrain for 3.3 DLs as well -- i.e. what Marcus will be working on. I know right now, we're using SourceForge for that though. > >> The "possibly Apache" in 1) is due to the fact that I haven't understood yet >> what technology Apache will be using and if Apache will distribute only >> sources or binaries too (it's obvious that we as a project will release >> sources and binaries, but I'm not 100% sure that Apache wants to put >> binaries on its mirrors too: I think so). Well it's not all that complicated actually. Take a look at the security patch info page... http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-0037.html and you can see what the link looks like. Actual source/binaries are, for us, put in: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/ This said, you could be right in having issues tracking down problems. Right now, the SF setup is more "user friendly" in my opinion. I thought we were *required* to use Apache for downloads, but maybe we've gotten a dispensation for this release. Though I didn't think is was 100% someplace else. I admit I haven't kept up as much as I should have though. The other issue is how will it LOOK to users -- one moment they may be one place; if they happen to do a shift-reload, they may go someplace else with an entirely different look and feel. >> >> Fact is, we should avoid the random selection as much as possible, mainly to >> be able to quickly identify problems, and you will see details in that >> thread. The cleaner separation we can get, the better. >> > > So how about something very simple: > > 1) AOO 3.4 downloads use SourceForge by default from the > /download/index.html page. Just like they are doing today. This WOULD make things a lot simpler. > > But we also have a links there that point to Apache mirrors for: > > a) Hashes and detached signatures > b) source distribution > c) a link to the full release tree Well, SF will need to implement in their sidebar or the main page for openoffice.org they have, right? Anyway, good conversation. > > In other words, no rolling the dice, noting fancy. 100% of normal > users will download from SF. > > 2) When we enable the automated updates, in a week or two, then we > decide what we want to do. Maybe we do it via SF. Maybe MirrorBrain. > Maybe a mix, > >> On the other side, release time is approaching and I can only hope that >> talks between Peter Poeml (MirrorBrain author) and Apache Infra, that had >> started on this list, are progressing now. >> > > I think it is too late for any of those talks to influence how we deal > with AOO 3.4 initial downloads. But maybe the update downloads in a > couple of weeks. > > -Rob > >> Regards, >> Andrea. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MzK "Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you And life has a funny way of helping you out Helping you out." -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette