Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92A1B9B4C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79831 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 23:12:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79768 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 23:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79759 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2012 23:12:49 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:12:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username arielch, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:12:48 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:12:46 -0300 From: Ariel Constenla-Haile To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Linux builds Message-ID: <20120409231246.GA29666@localhost> References: <4F816821.2030903@gmx.net> <4F816AAE.2080700@googlemail.com> <20120408233105.GA2885@localhost> <4F82B706.9030509@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F82B706.9030509@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, J=FCrgen Schmidt wrote: >=20 > Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new > Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119162 >=20 > I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I would be > interested if others can confirm this problem. >=20 > I will be offline for ~1 day because of traveling and I will make > the call for VOTE depending on the feedback from you. Old basis package set remaining is the default behaviour, at least tested with OOo 3.0.0. On Fedora 16: - install OOo 3.0.0 (OOO300_m9 9358) - install OOo 3.1.1 (OOO310_m19 9420) 1) there is an issue with the desktop integration, same for AOO 2) the old basis3.0 remains: /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1 All ooobasis3.0 packages are kept. Only the following packages are updated: Updating: openoffice.org-ure =20 openoffice.org3 =20 openoffice.org3-base =20 openoffice.org3-calc =20 openoffice.org3-dict-en openoffice.org3-dict-es openoffice.org3-dict-fr openoffice.org3-draw =20 openoffice.org3-en-US =20 openoffice.org3-impress openoffice.org3-math =20 openoffice.org3-writer=20 See http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.0.0-3.1.1.txt Update to OOo 3.2.1 (000320_m18 9502) leaves: /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2 http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.1.1-3.2.1.txt Update to OOo 3.3.0 (000330_m20 9567) leaves: /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3 http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.2.1-3.3.0.txt Update AOO 340m1(Build:9590) rev.1310206 leaves: /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3 /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.4 http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.3.0-AOO3.4.0.txt In every case, the application can be launched with /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice The previous desktop integration package has to be removed in order to install the new one. -------------------------------------------------------- Conclusion:=20 1) leaving remaining basis packages is the behaviour since OOo 3.0.0.=20 2) desktop integration install failing happens since OOo 3.0.0 3) The real issue (may be unrelated to 1 and 2) is: [ariel@localhost ~]$ openoffice.org3 Application Error Fatal exception: Signal 6 Stack: /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x= 34f5b)[0x7fedaf274f5b] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x= 35f20)[0x7fedaf275f20] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x= 35fdf)[0x7fedaf275fdf] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3456836300] /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35)[0x3456836285] /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b)[0x3456837b9b] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(+0x15d3c2)[0x7= fedabb9d3c2] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x211c= 6)[0x7fedaefd81c6] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(+0x18740f)[0x7= fedabbc740f] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x= 35fb3)[0x7fedaf275fb3] /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3456836300] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/deployment.uno.so(+0x4d8= f2)[0x7fed964c08f2] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/deployment.uno.so(+0x51f= 2f)[0x7fed964c4f2f] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/deployment.uno.so(+0x511= 59)[0x7fed964c4159] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libdeploymentmisc.so(_ZN= 7dp_misc16syncRepositoriesERKN3com3sun4star3uno9ReferenceINS2_3ucb19XComman= dEnvironmentEEE+0x308)[0x7fedae021558] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x3b73= 0)[0x7fedaeff2730] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x2abe= 9)[0x7fedaefe1be9] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(+0x1871c8)[0x7= fedabbc71c8] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(_Z6SVMainv+0x1= d)[0x7fedabbc733f] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(soffice= _main+0x9c)[0x7fedaf00a5fc] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin(main+0xb)[0x40102b] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x345682169d] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin[0x400f59] /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: line 122: 9294 Aborted = "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@" After erasing all the old basis packages, AOO can be launched (no need to reinstall any package from AOO 3.4) http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-erase-old-basis.txt Regards --=20 Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPg2zuAAoJEMjP1bm45QNW538P/jJZOGFCRamVmTXXJpnPEG1n HXhc4dKsWC3No4zTEDzOHOZC23y0YC1NGJf6Gm5Z/OqB5M2q67ZdDsQnUk3PNm27 +hzl9+e+QM+Ik517SpCa9zfftAMbUF5KwWC7Sxw6KJrosszmT2ryGS9vJxuS5Kyo 7CUBcWomiOhG6byszHHvm9qZIEEHy3QDlBeHKYZzEDwX5p8glw0HmEhYO4nX67vK y6d7aMgp8BGtYghniVonp+n4aH6ELFkMlyah9O3a2kOAXlYNObP8ZzFT4tl+wJ8z 81uoWRP0B4yNiM6nrXnE7NDOYjEnGTNv0rU8JGgiqGxpOlKRpOWhgDMItfSKAPtc R2qjQXwo3ck299EHaqlu75PnflYrdLsDp5Hdxlxvd6khJzdoAU3Df26sz47wNfa8 2CuZW18ybRQH+eZuY7Oi/+HyjeyN2/GLEAn1Sn2NR1UlvXMIhXtwytJhClRcTDdU qdmiZAaPingzMIvlpQAUMDf8qlzCqEc3RQzczLiTOqBr6FoMGkoI316v6cvciviQ CApSynGz5xhhxymOznX+V1aW46V3QsextSqk5gxx7Je8jNJinvfceupZKV+Cy2mk bmgAbFuz9zJyjuPipIwLN2dSEULkuH25v8uHTDp+WF3ewsJ57aY6lz+EV7RS9iEk jpD8tNf3GGFwT9/lKZWk =JjEB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--