Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AD429F33 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62871 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 20:51:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62802 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 20:51:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62794 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 20:51:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:51:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [205.178.146.64] (HELO omr14.networksolutionsemail.com) (205.178.146.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:51:06 +0000 Received: from cm-omr1 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr14.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q35Koihu028433 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:50:44 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr1 smtp.user=drew@baseanswers.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authenticated-UID: drew@baseanswers.com Received: from [207.255.220.76] ([207.255.220.76:34069] helo=[192.168.1.3]) by cm-omr1 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id C1/49-20310-4A50E7F4; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:50:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a graphic modification From: drew To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Kay Schenk In-Reply-To: References: <53067431.219096.1333613693156.JavaMail.open-xchange@com4.strato.de> <1333647662.2128.YahooMailNeo@web162104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-Aww000bkUBG3PntM+xyR" Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:50:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1333659044.2842.21.camel@sybil-gnome> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 --=-Aww000bkUBG3PntM+xyR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Acevedo wrote: > Dave, > > I sent the updated logos to both Rob and Drew just a few seconds ago... I thought that there was a request for a 200x100px png so did create one from this, is there is a need. Can't work with the psd file directly here but from what I could work with..took a little detour through GIMP to drop out all white, as the images I could work with had a little halo around the different elements - which end up as bitmaps here..anyway did that, then scaled it's a bit cleaner I think then again maybe not, set the correct canvas size and added back a white background. So wasn't sure - included Kay on this email and attaching the 200x100 png - if it isn't needed currently just disregard..OK //drew > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > On Apr 5, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Michael Acevedo wrote: > > > > > Hi Nancy, > > > > > > The source file is in .psd. Would Apache want those as well? > > > > Yes, please! And thank you! > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Nancy K wrote: > > > > > >> Wonderful! If Michael has the .psd or .ai vector original file, and we > > can > > >> all access it later, that will help us resize it without the fuzziness - > > >> and make further changes. > > >> > > >> I found the .psd and .ai feather file under apache.org/images > > >> http://www.apache.org/images/ if that will be helpful later in any > > >> redesign. Is there a /image > > >> > > >> It would be nice to add a dimension to the .jpg/.gif/.non-vector image > > >> file name instead of 'small' 'wide' - I would suggest a width - > > something > > >> like nameOfImage100px.jpg. > > >> > > >> I am new - but noticed openoffice.org/images file and a cujrent folder > > >> for logos - good organization! > > >> Nancy > > >> > > >> Nancy Web Design > > >> Free 24 hour pass to lynda.com. > > >> Video courses on SEO, CMS, > > >> Design and Software Courses > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: Michael Acevedo > > > >> To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org " < > > >> ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > >> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 10:26 AM > > >> Subject: Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a graphic > > >> modification > > >> > > >> Hello all members, > > >> > > >> It's Michael Acevedo, I am away from the computer that holds the files > > >> right now but I do have the original files if you need them. Where > > should I > > >> send them? > > >> > > >> Otherwise, I am deeply honored by having Apache selecting the my logo > > for > > >> OpenOffice. > > >> > > >> Please let me know. > > >> > > >> On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Kay Schenk wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Guillaume Fernandez (Club) < > > >>>> guillm.frndz@club.fr> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I think that kevin's changes are very important. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 1) The looks is indeed more profesionnal. The capitalization has > > >>> enhanced > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> natural readability of the logo. > > >>>>> The kerning is better while somewhat a little dense (intermediate > > >>>> position > > >>>>> would > > >>>>> be great). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2) The look of the main webpage is crucial : we absolutly have to > > >> get a > > >>>>> professional look and in my opinion this is not the case today. > > >>> because > > >>>>> of the > > >>>>> JPEG quality and resolution (blurred image). We should improve the > > >>>> quality > > >>>>> of > > >>>>> the JPEG (or use a non-destructive PNG). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> +1. When I voted in favor of that logo I assumed that was just an > > >>> example > > >>>> rendering and that we had the SVG source for it, so we could scale it > > >> to > > >>>> other sizes. If we do not have these sources, then I don't think the > > >>> logo > > >>>> will work. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Guillaume > > >>>>> (I am a new suscriber here at ooo-dev). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi Kevin, > > >>>>> On 04.04.2012 05:55, Kevin Grignon wrote: > > >>>>> Kay et al. > > >>>>> I can help here. I have the skills and the tools. > > >>>>> Beyond getting the right size, I'd like to propose a few other small > > >>>> tweak > > >>>>> to > > >>>>> the rendered logo. My proposed enhancements don't change the voted > > >> and > > >>>>> approved > > >>>>> concept, rather, they merely some polish to the concept as we move > > >>>> towards > > >>>>> production consumption. > > >>>>> See proposed enhancements: 4. Enhancements to Selected Logo Concept > > >>>> (Kevin > > >>>>> Grignon - started 2012-04-04) > > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals > > >>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I like the change of "Apache" to gray but am not so sure about its > > >>>>> capitalization. I understand the reason (after you pointed it out to > > >> us > > >>>>> non-artists :) though. > > >>>>> The kerning looks more homogeneous but somewhat dense. For example > > >> the > > >>> i > > >>>>> and c > > >>>>> in Office seem to almost touch. > > >>>>> Regards, Andre > > >>>>> I'll need to access the source files. > > >>>>> Regards, Kevin > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Dave Fisher > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > >>>>> On 04/03/2012 03:46 PM, drew jensen wrote: > > >>>>> Maybe one of should drop Michael Acevedo a note, see if he already > > >> has > > >>> a > > >>>>> source > > >>>>> file handy - xcf, svg. > > >>>>> If not - I don't know of a svg (or any vector based) file for the bug > > >>>> part > > >>>>> of > > >>>>> the image - I know how to recreate one properly from the 256px png > > >>> image > > >>>>> and > > >>>>> wou > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best, > > > Michael > > > > > > --=-Aww000bkUBG3PntM+xyR--