From ooo-dev-return-16596-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Apr 16 12:47:46 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23BE69274 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93022 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2012 12:47:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92952 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2012 12:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92938 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2012 12:47:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:39 +0000 Received: by pbcum15 with SMTP id um15so5321570pbc.6 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:47:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xn2IbvOrITIwkI9vSoZQvCpHVToIhbfO3RFoIOjCv0g=; b=wik50QQCMwH7KMK0UdHWclA8P5FY1/GGSOrMTpnnEcRo/rjJA/s5KzM90pAWkTlds2 pmZuPk3KPnA+Us6Y+yZPyJFbdiQI4Uys7gYWrMx/rgbhpKGyuKi3lSYGV5qprfgxiPDL X5UlgKFQJhrIgaD5Hj59d/BPyDAwhXm0YoojhB4wU+SVZoMTR259V6cdrXIHr+n68r2w xIFCQ8D2FOwhCMH7PGSS9AzckqiliXmjIJhDSSvogWkwq+OwTd5jq/NeYmZOf/0zZbro yB21HaoUjtvhjDe0uEOTsouPDfJX4WaP/S/N8yFceOzglb0QkBrJyH+EaafJyhEMnNEW S2SQ== Received: by 10.68.201.169 with SMTP id kb9mr27435223pbc.146.1334580439316; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.5.22.197] ([219.141.184.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f7sm17635328pbr.3.2012.04.16.05.47.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F8C14CE.3050103@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:47:10 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Cannot select a different icon set References: <4F8369D1.3040003@apache.org> <4F836D74.8020305@apache.org> <4F8AEDFA.6010301@apache.org> <4F8AF961.4010902@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4F8AF961.4010902@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/15/12 6:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Il 15/04/2012 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Follow the process. If you want to >> propose it as a release blocker then edit the BZ issue and set the 3.4 >> release blocker flag to "?". > > But I had followed the process, right? Just before posting here I had > set the flag. I see it correctly at > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119208 > I think it is not really a showstopper and I would like to proceed with the RC as proposed. We will fix it for the next version. Juergen > If anything is still missing, I'll be happy to conform, so long as we > don't exaggerate with formality and we don't change the focus of our > discussions to formal details rather than the real issues. > > By the way, if we have up-to-date documentation on the QA process I'd > appreciate being pointed to it; so far I clearly adopted a partially old > process, so things that were obvious to me (since I had classified the > issue as P2) might not be obvious to you. > > Regards, > Andrea.