incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:33:56 GMT
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shenfeng Liu <liushenf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rob,
>  Per the wiki where Lily proposed the RC build test plan, it will take <=
> 1 week.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+RC+Build+Test+Plan
>
>

OK.  I would recommend that we do not delay the vote for the regression
test results.  Instead, we should have the voting period be long enough
that the regression tests will be done before the vote closes.  That way
IPMC members can do their release verification in parallel with Lily's
final testing.

-Rob



> - Simon
>
> 2012/4/5 Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
>
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu <liushenf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Juergen,
> > >  Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a
> > regression
> > > testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the
> community
> > > vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE
> > > perspective, after the build passed her regression test.
> > >  Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build?  How
> > many days?
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> >
> >
> > > - Simon
> > >
> > > 2012/4/5 xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Juergen,
> > > >
> > > > Usually how long the vote will continue?
> > > >
> > > > Lily
> > > >
> > > > 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> How long shall we wait before we vote?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance
> to
> > > > take
> > > > > a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will
> send a
> > > > call
> > > > > for the VOTE on various lists then.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Juergen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt<jogischmidt@**googlemail.com<
> > > > jogischmidt@googlemail.com>
> > > >  >> >:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the
way to
> > our
> > > > >>> first
> > > > >>> release.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes
an
> ALv2
> > > > >>> header.
> > > > >>> The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN
pt-BR nl
> > hu
> > > ru
> > > > >>> zh-TW fi
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them
were
> > > already
> > > > >>> built for the developer snapshots.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We should take a closer look on these builds and when we
are
> > > satisfied
> > > > >>> with
> > > > >>> the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used
as our
> > > first
> > > > >>> RC.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Juergen
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message