incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a graphic modification
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:37:51 GMT
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Guillaume Fernandez (Club) <
guillm.frndz@club.fr> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I think that kevin's changes are very important.
>
>
> 1) The looks is indeed more profesionnal. The capitalization has enhanced
> the
> natural readability of the logo.
> The kerning is better while somewhat a little dense (intermediate position
> would
> be great).
>
>
> 2) The look of the main webpage is crucial : we absolutly have to get a
> professional look and in my opinion this is not the case today.  because
> of the
> JPEG quality and resolution (blurred image). We should improve the quality
> of
> the JPEG (or use a non-destructive PNG).
>
>
+1.  When I voted in favor of that logo I assumed that was just an example
rendering and that we had the SVG source for it, so we could scale it to
other sizes.  If we do not have these sources, then I don't think the logo
will work.


>
>
> Guillaume
> (I am a new suscriber here at ooo-dev).
>
> Hi Kevin,
> On 04.04.2012 05:55, Kevin Grignon wrote:
> Kay et al.
> I can help here. I have the skills and the tools.
> Beyond getting the right size, I'd like to propose a few other small tweak
> to
> the rendered logo. My proposed enhancements don't change the voted and
> approved
> concept, rather, they merely some polish to the concept as we move towards
> production consumption.
> See proposed enhancements: 4. Enhancements to Selected Logo Concept (Kevin
> Grignon - started 2012-04-04)
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals>
>
> I like the change of "Apache" to gray but am not so sure about its
> capitalization. I understand the reason (after you pointed it out to us
> non-artists :) though.
> The kerning looks more homogeneous but somewhat dense. For example the i
> and c
> in Office seem to almost touch.
> Regards, Andre
> I'll need to access the source files.
> Regards, Kevin
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kay Schenk<kay....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Dave Fisher<dave...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 03:46 PM, drew jensen wrote:
> Maybe one of should drop Michael Acevedo a note, see if he already has a
> source
> file handy - xcf, svg.
> If not - I don't know of a svg (or any vector based) file for the bug part
> of
> the image - I know how to recreate one properly from the 256px png image
> and
> would be more then willing to do that, and recreate a likeness of the orb
> logo
> design all vector based and a jpg from that.
> I could likely have that here pretty quickly - it would be polite though to
> email Michael first however, I suppose.
> so - added him on CC to the mail here
> Howdy Michael,
> Good instincts on your proposal.. wondering if you have any source type
> fies for
> the jpg file posted t the wiki?
> //drew
>
> OK, maybe I was a bit confusing, and I hope this elaboration helps.
> What I think would be ideal is for someone to take the "cropped" image
>
>
> I
> did that is in svn at--
>
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/AOO_orb1_cropped.jpg
> <
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/AOO_orb1_cropped.jpg
> >
> this is now 217 x 79
> re-size it "up" to 275 x 100
> with clear lettering instead of the blurring that happens
> I have just about NO talent with graphics editing at all.
> So thanks for any help with this.
>
> We'll need the original vectors. I think the correct size will have the
> Orb be
> about 70px tall and centered vertically with 15px above, below and left of
> it.
> If the size is exactly 100 you probably don't need to do anything, but you
> might
> want to edit css/ooo.css
> #ooo-logo { height: 100px; padding-top: 4px; padding-left: 8px; }
>
> ahhhh! light dawns -- maybe. The graphic height is actually 79 -- I didn't
> tract
> down the css for any of this --but the rendering kept changing it to 100.
> It
> looks better alreger actually but then there's teh blrury text.
> OK, I'll play some more but it may have to wait until tomorrow.
> You may want to remove the height setting.
> To adjust the text banner here is the css in css/ooo.css:
> #bannercenter { padding: 31pt 2pt 14pt 2pt; float: center; color: #107EC0;
> }
> Play with the padding until pleased. I like to do this in Google Chrome.
>
> OK, I'll try again...
> Regards, Dave
> I also copied Michael...
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 15:23 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Folks --
> The new logo is rendered on the staging web site right now--
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>
> It will not go into the production site, www.openoffice.org until someone
> does a
> "publish" which I have not yet done. I'm not happy with the size or
> positioning
> of the new logo.
> I rendered an alternate version of it -- cropped -- in
>
>
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/images/AOO_logos/AOO_orb1_cropped.jpg
> <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/images/AOO_logos/AOO_orb1_cropped.jpg>
> This actually looks pretty good *except* the image itself is 217 x 79, and
> somehow the web site wants to render it at 275 x 100, which positioning
> wise is
> SUPER, but then the lettering is quite blurry.
> screen capture of what happened is at:
>
>
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Web+Site+with+Proposed+Logos
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Web+Site+with+Proposed+Logos
> >
> So, I would LOVE for some creative person out there to take
>
>
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/images/AOO_logos/AOO_orb1_cropped.jpg
> <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/images/AOO_logos/AOO_orb1_cropped.jpg>
> (cropped version is in svn also)
> change it's size to 275 x 100 and make the lettering better.
> On the other hand, if you love the staging rendering, I'll go ahead and
> publish
> it.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message