incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Pages in the social media
Date Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:24:31 GMT
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alexandro Colorado <jza@oooes.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Alexandro Colorado <jza@oooes.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure what you mean by time is running out. Even if release
>>>>>> date approaches there is no deadline to talk strategy and a good
tool
>>>>>> to manage more than publish.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When OpenOffice 3.4 is released, it is very likely that the press releases
>>>>> will contain links to the "main" or "official" Apache OpenOffice channels;
>>>>> it wouldn't make sense to change them later and it is obvious that we
can
>>>>> advertise only channels that are under control of several PPMC members.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But the official ones are already set up.  We've already had this
>>>> discussion.  The accounts are set up and they have already been shared
>>>> with the PPMC .  We already have several PPMC co-authors on them.
>>>> They are already linked to on the website.  Announcements have already
>>>> gone out to ooo-announce.  They are already in the AOO 3.4
>>>> announcement draft.  Content is going out on these channels, from the
>>>> PPMC, on a daily basis.  This is all already done, in preparation for
>>>> the AOO 3.4 launch.
>>>
>>> It would be good if you close those accounts and work with the ones
>>> that were already working. Like I said before doesnt make sense to
>>> duplicate efforts.
>>>
>>
>> Like your Google+ page that has not had a post since last November?
>> What is your excuse there?   Google+ has integrated multi-author
>> support.  You don't need to spend months "investigating" alternative
>> tooling.  It is already there.
>
> You are free to investigate and post there as well. The info has been
> public since 2 years ago on how to post. there is no need to actually
> go through creating new accounts.
>
>>
>> To me it looks like you are merely hoarding.  You signed up for that
>> account on the exact day that Google enabled business pages on
>> Google+.  But then you did nothing with it but sit on it.  You've made
>> zero effort to enable the PPMC to work with these accounts.   You
>> started zero threads on how best to use the account.  You've made zero
>> offers to share access with the PPMC.
>
>
> When google plus started there was no way on ad-hoc users to it, now
> the Google plus account have 7 managers that can post at any time.
>

If it didn't happen on the list it didn't happen.  Please show me the
thread where you  asked for PPMC members to volunteer for that
account, and where they responded.

-Rob

>>
>> As I said before, hoarding is a losing strategy at Apache.  Those who
>> share will see their DNA survive.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>>>
>>>> This isn't about personal control.  This is about sharing.  Those who
>>>> hoard will be passed by and left behind.  Those who work through the
>>>> process and openly share and enable others with see their initiatives
>>>> succeed.  It is that simple.  You cannot control by withholding.
>>>>
>>>> If you (or any other PPMC member) would like to be added as a
>>>> co-author to the Twitter or Google+ account, please let me know and I
>>>> will add you immediately.  If you want to be an author on the Facebook
>>>> group, talk to Raphael.
>>>>
>>>>> At that point, everybody, from the PPMC or not, will still be welcome
to
>>>>> open a channel dedicated to OpenOffice (respecting the trademark policy),
>>>>> but these channels would be "secondary" or "unofficial".
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>  Andrea.

Mime
View raw message