incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <>
Subject Re: [WWW] Australian OO site
Date Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:01:50 GMT
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <> wrote:
> Rob,
> I'd suggest rather than "normalizing" one simply approaches the site owner and talk:
inform them of the new order, as it were.

It will be an easier conversation once we have a community icon, and
guidance for these kinds of things.  Otherwise, what would we be
asking them to do right now, if anything?

But maybe it would be useful to make a list of such extended community
promotion properties, websites as well as Facebook, Twitter, Google+,
etc., and send them some materials once the AOO 3.4 release is
imminent.  A press pack of sorts.  A summary of what is new in AOO
3.4, some screen shots, some info on the project at Apache, etc.  If
we have a a special "download" or other community icon, we could
include that.

The idea would make it easy for them to update and communicate to
their audience about AOO 3.4

We can "normalize" later, I agree.


> Louis
> On 2012-04-06, at 13:36 , Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Ian <> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> I found this is it part of the Apache World
>>> .. or should it be? I can't see how recent it is, but it should probably be
>>> brought into line with the current world?
>> It is not hosted at a domain that we control. But the domain name
>> "" would probably suggest to the visitor that it is
>> affiliated with the project.
>> But it also has a disclaimer at the bottom of the page that says
>> " is an independent website assisting with the
>> promotion, marketing and distribution of the world renound
>> Office Productivity Suite." and also " is
>> a registered trademark".
>> It uses the project's trademarks, including name, and logos.  But it
>> links back to our site for downloads and community. The site owners
>> are also monetizing the page via advertising.
>> So the practical harm to our users is much less than those sites that
>> offer the users adulterated versions of downloads.  I
>> think this is something we can "normalize" once we define a standard
>> community logo that can be used more freely than our official project
>> logo.
>> -Rob
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ian

View raw message