incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From xia zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Linux builds
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:20:50 GMT
Ariel,

Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually? It isn't
reasonable for end users.

Though keeping the old package is default behavior, I couldn't understand
the reason. If just want to keeping the previous configuration etc, is it
possible to split and erase other packages?

No matter which reason, back to the upgrade problem, we need find one way
to resolve the couldn't launch or crash problem.

Best Regards,

Lily

2012/4/10 Ariel Constenla-Haile <arielch@apache.org>

> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, J├╝rgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
> > Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
> >
> > I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I would be
> > interested if others can confirm this problem.
> >
> > I will be offline for ~1 day because of traveling and I will make
> > the call for VOTE depending on the feedback from you.
>
> Old basis package set remaining is the default behaviour, at least
> tested with OOo 3.0.0. On Fedora 16:
>
> - install OOo 3.0.0 (OOO300_m9 9358)
> - install OOo 3.1.1 (OOO310_m19 9420)
>
> 1) there is an issue with the desktop integration, same for AOO
> 2) the old basis3.0 remains:
>
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1
>
> All ooobasis3.0 packages are kept.
> Only the following packages are updated:
>
> Updating:
>  openoffice.org-ure
>  openoffice.org3
>  openoffice.org3-base
>  openoffice.org3-calc
>  openoffice.org3-dict-en
>  openoffice.org3-dict-es
>  openoffice.org3-dict-fr
>  openoffice.org3-draw
>  openoffice.org3-en-US
>  openoffice.org3-impress
>  openoffice.org3-math
>  openoffice.org3-writer
>
> See http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.0.0-3.1.1.txt
>
> Update to OOo 3.2.1 (000320_m18 9502) leaves:
>
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2
>
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.1.1-3.2.1.txt
>
> Update to OOo 3.3.0 (000330_m20 9567) leaves:
>
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3
>
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.2.1-3.3.0.txt
>
> Update AOO 340m1(Build:9590) rev.1310206 leaves:
>
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.4
>
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-update-3.3.0-AOO3.4.0.txt
>
> In every case, the application can be launched with
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice
>
> The previous desktop integration package has to be removed in order to
> install the new one.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Conclusion:
>
> 1) leaving remaining basis packages is the behaviour since OOo 3.0.0.
> 2) desktop integration install failing happens since OOo 3.0.0
> 3) The real issue (may be unrelated to 1 and 2) is:
>
>
> [ariel@localhost ~]$ openoffice.org3
> Application Error
>
> Fatal exception: Signal 6
> Stack:
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x34f5b)[0x7fedaf274f5b]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x35f20)[0x7fedaf275f20]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x35fdf)[0x7fedaf275fdf]
> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3456836300]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35)[0x3456836285]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b)[0x3456837b9b]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(+0x15d3c2)[0x7fedabb9d3c2]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x211c6)[0x7fedaefd81c6]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(+0x18740f)[0x7fedabbc740f]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x35fb3)[0x7fedaf275fb3]
> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3456836300]
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/deployment.uno.so
> (+0x4d8f2)[0x7fed964c08f2]
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/deployment.uno.so
> (+0x51f2f)[0x7fed964c4f2f]
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/deployment.uno.so
> (+0x51159)[0x7fed964c4159]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libdeploymentmisc.so(_ZN7dp_misc16syncRepositoriesERKN3com3sun4star3uno9ReferenceINS2_3ucb19XCommandEnvironmentEEE+0x308)[0x7fedae021558]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x3b730)[0x7fedaeff2730]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(+0x2abe9)[0x7fedaefe1be9]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(+0x1871c8)[0x7fedabbc71c8]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libvcl.so(_Z6SVMainv+0x1d)[0x7fedabbc733f]
>
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/libsofficeapp.so(soffice_main+0x9c)[0x7fedaf00a5fc]
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin(main+0xb)[0x40102b]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x345682169d]
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin[0x400f59]
> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: line 122:  9294 Aborted
>     "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@"
>
>
> After erasing all the old basis packages, AOO can be launched (no need
> to reinstall any package from AOO 3.4)
> http://people.apache.org/~arielch/packages/yum-erase-old-basis.txt
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message