incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From xia zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:57:05 GMT
Rob,

I agree, that's why I ask how long the vote will continue. Once RC build is
ready, the RC build test will begin, most focus on installation, and some
regression testing.

Lily

2012/4/5 Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>

> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shenfeng Liu <liushenf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Rob,
> >  Per the wiki where Lily proposed the RC build test plan, it will take <=
> > 1 week.
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+RC+Build+Test+Plan
> >
> >
>
> OK.  I would recommend that we do not delay the vote for the regression
> test results.  Instead, we should have the voting period be long enough
> that the regression tests will be done before the vote closes.  That way
> IPMC members can do their release verification in parallel with Lily's
> final testing.
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> > - Simon
> >
> > 2012/4/5 Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu <liushenf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Juergen,
> > > >  Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a
> > > regression
> > > > testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the
> > community
> > > > vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE
> > > > perspective, after the build passed her regression test.
> > > >  Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build?
>  How
> > > many days?
> > >
> > > -Rob
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > - Simon
> > > >
> > > > 2012/4/5 xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Juergen,
> > > > >
> > > > > Usually how long the vote will continue?
> > > > >
> > > > > Lily
> > > > >
> > > > > 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> How long shall we wait before we vote?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > We made some changes and we should at least give people the
> chance
> > to
> > > > > take
> > > > > > a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will
> > send a
> > > > > call
> > > > > > for the VOTE on various lists then.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Juergen
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt<jogischmidt@**googlemail.com<
> > > > > jogischmidt@googlemail.com>
> > > > >  >> >:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on
the way
> to
> > > our
> > > > > >>> first
> > > > > >>> release.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes
an
> > ALv2
> > > > > >>> header.
> > > > > >>> The other file is a left over and will be changed. A
mistake!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I would like to propose a new build based on revision
r1309668.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN
pt-BR
> nl
> > > hu
> > > > ru
> > > > > >>> zh-TW fi
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of
them were
> > > > already
> > > > > >>> built for the developer snapshots.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> We should take a closer look on these builds and when
we are
> > > > satisfied
> > > > > >>> with
> > > > > >>> the quality I would like to vote on this build to be
used as
> our
> > > > first
> > > > > >>> RC.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Juergen
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message