incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Albino Biasutti Neto <biasut...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:34:44 GMT
Hi.

2012/4/22 Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>

> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You snipped out the important part:
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sorry, thought you answered your own question there.  But since you
> >> bring it up, there is no requirement for a DISCLAIMER file. There is
> >> however a requirement for making the user aware of the incubation
> >> disclaimer.  See this page, where several options are listed:
> >>
> >>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-disclaimer
> >
> > Keep in mind that page is clearly labeled as a "DRAFT".
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#status
> >
> > The DISCLAIMER file is certainly in the correct place in the Source
> distribution.
> >
> > I think that I answered the question, but I would like to ask our
> project Mentors if this will be an issue in IPMC voting. I've seen enough
> on general@i.a.o to know that it may be for some and not others.
> >
>
> Not an issue for me either.  That fact that OpenOffice is under
> incubation at Apache has been leading tech news for nearly a year now.
> People who know nothing else about Apache know this fact.
>
> > So, while this is not a problem for me, if it is likely IPMC will
> request an RC2 over this we should know now.
> >
>
> But worth taking it through the voting process, IMHO, to see if there
> are any other issues. One big issue or several smaller ones could be
> enough for us to kill the vote prematurely.  But it would be extremely
> inefficient to waste 48-hours preparing another RC every time someone
> finds a single thing that is not consistent with the
> self-contradictory draft incubation guidelines.  There is no better
> time than the present to do a complete review.
>
> -Rob
>
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >>> The SDK and Binaries are missing the DISCLAIMER file. Is a missing
> Incubation DISCLAIMER in a binary package enough to prevent release? I
> think probably not, but this may be an edge case. The application pop-ups
> do mention "Incubation" and every page linked back to
> thewww.openoffice.org shows the Disclaimer...
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Rob
> >>>
> >
>

I installed some extensions in aoo: cogroo, vero and smart, congratulation!
:)

More tests... ;)

Best,
Albino @bino28

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message