incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE} a few DL questions...
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:41:38 GMT


On 04/26/2012 01:32 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/26/2012 07:02 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Kay Schenk<kay.schenk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've been working on a prototype of the DL button in the
>>> /download/test area
>>> given our discussions about split mirror setup for 3.4 etc. I have a few
>>> more edits to do before sending out a notification about final review
>>> (later today).
>>>
>>> But...I have a few questions for this release.
>>>
>>> * The DL scripts have a good amount of logic surrounding the
>>> naming/download
>>> of 3.2 and 3.1 releases-- the "old" naming schema. Since we won't be
>>> providing "friendly" DL buttons for these anymore, is it safe to pull
>>> this
>>> stuff out?
>>>
>>> * DL locations for Mac PPC and FreeBSD are as follows (excuse wrapping):
>>>
>>> var MIRROR_MAC_PPC_URL =
>>> "http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/macosppc/";
>>> var MIRROR_FREEBSD32_URL =
>>> "http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/freebsdx86/";
>>>
>>> var MIRROR_FREEBSD64_URL =
>>> "http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/freebsdx86-64/";
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this still be the case or will all versions be served from either
>>> Apache or SourceForge? The DL logic needs to be changed if this
>>> alternate
>>> URL is not used.
>>>
>>
>> I think the main download link should only provide links to official
>> AOO releases. We could have another section (maybe in other.html)
>> where we can point to third party binaries and ports. But we should
>> have a disclaimer making it clear that these packages are not official
>> releases.
>
> I would also suggest to make this separate. But please not on the
> "other.html" webpage. ;-)
> It has already a hugh number of download links and much text that
> explains many points.
>
> I would do it with separate webpages. Like:
>
> other.html = only for AOO 3.4 files
> legacy.html = only for OOo 3.3.0 and older files
> community.html = all other stuff

yes, this is what I was thinking as well...

>
> BTW:
> If someone has thought about to rename "other.html" to a better sounding
> name. Please note that many other websites in the Internet refer to this
> page when they want to tell the people where to download OOo - or at
> least where to get install files for all platforms and languages.
>
>> I also agree that we should not inter-mix 3.3 and 3.4 downloads.
>
> Yes, me too.
>
>> Another thing to consider is how we actually invoke the download.
>> Right now we simply link to the SF site. So after the download is
>> done the user is left sitting at SF. This is not ideal. I wonder
>> whether it would be better to load the SF page in a new page, via
>> target="_blank" and then refresh our download.html to contribute.html
>> so after the download is done, and the user closes the SF page, they
>> are back in the openoffice website with a "thanks for downloading"
>> messsage and followup info to engage the user in the community.
>
> Good point. To show the contribution webpage after the download has
> started is indeed valuable for our project.
>
> Marcus
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you
  And life has a funny way of helping you out
  Helping you out."
                             -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette

Mime
View raw message