incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andre Fischer ...@a-w-f.de>
Subject Re: Linux builds
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:57:35 GMT
On 10.04.2012 07:12, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:16:38PM +0200, J├╝rgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody have tested an upgrade installation with these new
>> Linux packages and can verify the reported problem, see
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
>>
>> I think we haven't noticed this problem before and I would be
>> interested if others can confirm this problem.
>>
>> I will be offline for ~1 day because of traveling and I will make
>> the call for VOTE depending on the feedback from you.
>
> Old basis package set remaining is the default behaviour, at least
> tested with OOo 3.0.0. On Fedora 16:
>
> - install OOo 3.0.0 (OOO300_m9 9358)
> - install OOo 3.1.1 (OOO310_m19 9420)
>
> 1) there is an issue with the desktop integration, same for AOO
> 2) the old basis3.0 remains:
>
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
> /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1
>
> All ooobasis3.0 packages are kept.

Strange.

Here is what I would expect would happen on an update:

- There is one top-level or meta package that has dependencies on all 
the other packages (directly or indirectly)
- This meta package of OOo3.? is replaced by AOO3.4
- The packages of OOo3.? are not referenced anymore and get removed 
automatically.  The new packages are installed.  Everything is find.

So one of the following things goes wrong:
- The old meta package is not removed because the new one has no 
relationship to it (maybe because of a different application name)
- The old meta package is removed but some other package keeps a 
reference to one of OOo3.? base packages.
- Something else that I did not think of yet (I am currently on a 
business trip and am still adapting to the new time zone)

Regards,
Andre

 >[...]

Mime
View raw message