incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org>
Subject Fwd: [Daniel Shahaf: Re: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects]
Date Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:09:55 GMT
OOo PPMC:

An Apache mirror operator asks how much traffic to expect AOOo downloads
to cause, given that SF will be the primary avenue of downloading and
Apache mirrors the secondary.

Your input, please?  (an estimate, or refuting the assumptions)

Thanks

-- 
Daniel
ASF Infra

----- Forwarded message from Daniel Shahaf <danielsh@apache.org> -----

> From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects
> To: [redacted]
> Cc: infrastructure@apache.org
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:57 +0300
> Message-ID: <20120420110557.GH2867@lp-shahaf.local>
> 
> I believe sourceforge will take most of the hit, but OpenOffice has
> sufficiently many users that even a small fraction who won't download
> via sourceforge might be noticeable.  I can't quantify this into hard
> numbers; I'll ask the OpenOffice PPMC about this and get back to you.
> 
> [redacted] wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:42:45 +0100:
> > Thanks - One final question :) I am curious, should be still be
> > expecting the 100-500 times increase in bandwidth that was predicted?
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh@apache.org> wrote:
> > > As I understand it, Apache OpenOffice's download pages would link to
> > > both sourceforge and to Apache mirrors, but would contain text
> > > recommending that downloaders try the sourceforge links first.

Mime
View raw message