incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From drew <d...@baseanswers.com>
Subject Re: Symphony contribution logistics
Date Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:26:56 GMT
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:10 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, drew jensen
> <drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:32 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> Wearing my IBM hat for a minute...
> >>
> >> We're putting the final touches on our Symphony contribution.   The
> >> contribution will look something like this:
> >>
> >> 1) A source tree
> >>
> >> 2) An SGA that covers IBM intellectual property in that source tree
> >>
> >> 3) A set of binary install images, for the convenience of project
> >> members wishing to review this contribution
> >>
> >> 4) Some written material that describes in detail the enhancements
> >> made in Symphony compared to OpenOffice.
> >>
> >> The source tree is comparable in size to OpenOffice, so it will not be
> >> possible for us to just check it in without interfering with Apache
> >> SVN mirroring.  So I'm proposing that we (IBM) will make a local SVN
> >> repository, check the code into there, and then generate a dumpfile
> >> from SVN that we can share with Infra, and which they can schedule for
> >> import.
> >>
> >> I propose that we put this tree here:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/symphony/trunk
> >>
> >> Once we've made the contribution, and once the community has had the
> >> opportunity to review what is there, we can then have a discussion on
> >> how we can make best use of this contribution to advance the project.
> >>
> >> Does this sound right?
> >
> >
> >> Any concerns?
> >
> > Yeah, a few - but I'll wait for the release to happen first.
> >
> 
> We intend to make the contribution immediately after the 3.4 release.
> We're doing the work now.  That's why I'm bring this up now.
> 
> If you withhold your concerns until after the 3.4 release then we may
> be unable to address your feedback until after the contribution is
> made.

*smile*... well, in that case I have no concerns - I guess it will all
be quite good, can't wait to see it :)

//drew

> 
> -Rob
> 
> > //drew
> >
> >
> 



Mime
View raw message