Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D00D9AF5 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53417 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 21:33:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53302 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 21:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53268 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 21:33:25 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:33:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:33:25 +0000 Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so1263964vcb.6 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:33:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.176.198 with SMTP id ck6mr164202vdc.0.1331674404496; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.199.67 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:33:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:33:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context) From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Larry Gusaas wrot= e: > > On 2012-03-13 2:55 PM =C2=A0Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Larry Gusaas >> =C2=A0wrote: >>> >>> On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM =C2=A0Rob Weir wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaas >>>> =C2=A0wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM =C2=A0Rob Weir wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We are in our final weeks of testing >>>>>> and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release. >>>>> >>>>> I thought the product name was changed to Apache OpenOffice. Shouldn'= t >>>>> the >>>>> release be "Apache OpenOffice 3.4"? >>>>> Or are you going to use "OpenOffice.org 3.4"? Or, as you stated, >>>>> =C2=A0"OpenOffice 3.4"? >>>>> >>>> Is your legal name really Larry, or something like Lawrence? =C2=A0Doe= s >>>> your middle initial stand for something, or is it really just "I"? >>> >>> Are you going to answer the question? Or just make totally irrelevant >>> remarks about my name? >>> >> I thought the point was obvious. =C2=A0Sorry if it was not clear. =C2=A0= We have >> proper names and we have short names. =C2=A0When I make an off-hand ment= ion >> of "OpenOffice" or even "AOO" that does not imply that I'm making a >> formal notice of a product renaming. Just as you being called "Larry" >> does not amount to a legal name change. > > The point was obvious, but it did not answer the question. You still have= n't > answered the question. > BTW, Larry is not short for Lawrence. The I obviously does stand for > something since it has a period after it. > > >> There is a place for using formal names. When I sign a legal document >> I am "Robert Cameron Weir". =C2=A0But here I am just Rob Weir. =C2=A0Whe= n we >> mention the product in a formal setting, we will call it "Apache >> OpenOffice" at the first mention of it on a page or an article or a >> press release. =C2=A0But subsequent references in the same document may >> just be called "OpenOffice". =C2=A0Formal names and short names. I'm sur= e >> we're all familiar with the concept. > > > None of which answer my question. "Shouldn't the release be "Apache > OpenOffice 3.4"? > > The wiki page > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Current+Status+FAQ > states: > "Future releases from the OpenOffice.org domain will be called "Apache > OpenOffice"." and" > "Once Apache OpenOffice v3.4 is released, the project recommends you repl= ace > your OpenOffice.org installation with it." > That wiki is just Simon having a spirited conversation with himself. I would not use it for anything more than a source of entertainment. On a slow day, > However the developer snapshots still install as =C2=A0"OpenOffice.org". > > So which name will the release version use? Is that clearer so you can > understand the question? > Actually that would have been a simpler question to ask. What you actually did is interject into a thread about calendar localization and when I wrote "We are in our final weeks of testing and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release" you started asking questions about why I had not said "Apache OpenOffice 3.4". I hope you can see how that was not a very good way of raising a new, entirely unrelated subject in an exiting thread. In any case, in the latest dev snapshots the about box says "Apache OpenOffice". There may be places where the changes has not yet been made, in the code and on the website. -Rob > > -- > _________________________________ > > Larry I. Gusaas > Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada > Website: http://larry-gusaas.com > "An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind > theirs." - Edgard Varese > >