Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77FD09E45 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93444 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 20:52:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93383 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 20:52:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93374 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2012 20:52:48 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:48 +0000 Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so1193112vcb.6 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.89.106 with SMTP id bn10mr3327234vdb.116.1332967967400; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.199.67 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Regional AOO sites [was: Re: openoffice.fm] From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f3a5631a1b404bc53cac5 --20cf307f3a5631a1b404bc53cac5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: > Hi > > 2012/3/14 Rob Weir : > > 2) Domain name "openoffice.fm" > > > > Both are likely confusing to the consumer and falsely imply the > > identity and source of their goods. > > > > BTW, I created a place in Bugzilla to track things like this: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/enter_bug.cgi?product=trademark > > Rob, a NL related question: if someone of us bring up a website for > regional/local group, in native language, how do you will see this > act? > > We have the ability to host such sites here at Apache, as subdomains of the openoffice.org domain. For example, http://de.openoffice.org is for German. It then redirects to http://www.openoffice.org/de/ which is a subdirectory of our web site's content tree. If a website is done that way, then project committers have direct access to checking in changes, via the CMS or Subversion. Other contributors can submit patches. > A example was here, in Brazil. At begin, the "openoffice.org.br" was > with us, and we created a portal with Drupal, talking in brazilian > portuguese all news about ODF/OOo in our country and the world (with > the respective translation, when was the case). At final, in function > of the trademark problems with "openoffice", we changed to "broffice", > but always clearly linked with main project. > > Can we follow this strategy? > > Which strategy? Calling something "BrOffice"? > A CMS can give us a more flexibility to work. Is possible? What you > (and Apache) think about? > > For a website hosted at Apache, as part of the openoffice.org website, the CMS is available by default. It is also certainly possible to have your own website, external to Apache, and run by local volunteers. But it would be important to choose a domain name that did not imply that it was an official OpenOffice website. The simplest thing, I think, would be to host your website at Apache, something like http://br.openoffice.org. Would that work? -Rob > best, > Claudio > --20cf307f3a5631a1b404bc53cac5--