Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74A3B9799 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56934 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 09:31:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56861 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 09:31:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56850 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2012 09:31:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:31:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lilyzhao8@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:31:11 +0000 Received: by pbbrp12 with SMTP id rp12so581221pbb.6 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lilyzhao8@gmail.com designates 10.68.74.138 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.74.138; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lilyzhao8@gmail.com designates 10.68.74.138 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lilyzhao8@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=lilyzhao8@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.74.138]) by 10.68.74.138 with SMTP id t10mr153613pbv.126.1330594251733 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bJbQOb/9c1bfuBxfP9fmlyFJh8xly+TqXooyYe5zoGc=; b=QZsfWT74sYKt8zFx09cHv8t3vIEVtHo9+rELRzgRU0sdfF5KWdzB0RJDTItU7Sprth nax3rBh70cEkbHCJ64Uye5Uwpb1NvER/voATS724dCz1TEFpizEhZifSYOq5LeCcPAU1 g1pDlZPaqhyOveWOQifUcaUaMaTnea8UQLyvA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.74.138 with SMTP id t10mr130372pbv.126.1330594251684; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.129.106 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 01:30:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:30:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/2/23 - 2012/2/29): From: xia zhao To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec547bfc9b63c1404ba2b1d04 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec547bfc9b63c1404ba2b1d04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:* Based on the test plan: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan 80% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas most impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance. 80% general testing have been done. These are general functional tests. *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/2/23 - 2012/2/29):* Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev. 1291124,1293550 Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac 10.6.8, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1 *Test Cases Executed:* *4 modules of IP clearance* - replace svg (LGPL) support - 3rd party/external library Core - report builder extension related - libneon removement testing *7 function areas of General testing:* - Interoperability testing with MS office in Impress animation, shape, table, pictures,chart etc - Interoperability testing with MS office in Writer in numbering and bullet, table, shape, Table of content,header/footer etc - Interoperability testing with MS office in Calc in chart, cell style - Calc filter, - Spell check - Vector picture testing - Chart (still 20% left) *Defects Summary:* So far 311 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0 Among them, 45 critical defects raised and 21 ones remain opening now. 29 defects raised in this week,and 4 defects closed. Based on previous testing and my observation so far, the animation imteroperability is one weak area, especially for text animation. Undo/redo is also week area. Besides, seems the quality on Windows is weak than that on inux. But the stability can give us much confidience, the unproduced crash is less occur against latest AOO 3.4 build though we did have some reproducable crash in bug pool. *Risk:* The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO to AOO, many test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be used for regression testing now. So again I appreciate and thakns for everyone's contribution to QA works. If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute to it, please go to AOO 3.4 main page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA. Get dev build from: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots Write your case by edit this page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/ And place your result: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults Or you may just do general testing based on your usage without test cases or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla directly: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this project's success! Besides, I created entry for project reporting on below wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting Uner it, you can get detail AOO 3.4 QA weekly status reports from this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+QA+Status+Report Best Regards, Lily --bcaec547bfc9b63c1404ba2b1d04--