Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A90F9F0E for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 06:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54968 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 06:15:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54876 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 06:15:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54829 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2012 06:15:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aliuzhe@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:15:05 +0000 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so122496wer.6 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of aliuzhe@gmail.com designates 10.180.79.229 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.79.229; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of aliuzhe@gmail.com designates 10.180.79.229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=aliuzhe@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=aliuzhe@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.79.229]) by 10.180.79.229 with SMTP id m5mr7289330wix.6.1330582485582 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:14:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+ujFOmP3iHaBm4PuA4AahfCKccJlDMMOClJI62VMuC0=; b=lkWwm8W6au+6Vl/IyDPCUNHJHADusFaCNCFlxKYUy8ZZS5PjAUslQx3GzZ1nssqkgT 8BSiTo/fs059HqkUHWkQtd3kQKI+yvHj6EB0JMVGM9dmddL2IQNmT53bCQHy90NBY/Aq BBJk00UNkVF6dxwYPAPRqUckhXUJX3O4tXCE4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.79.229 with SMTP id m5mr5847490wix.6.1330582485464; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.2.145 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:14:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:14:45 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Which name should used, "OpenOffice.org" or "Apache OpenOffice"? From: Zhe Liu To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I find a lot of UI controls still show the name "OpenOffice.org" . Should all of them be changed to "Apache OpenOffice"? -- Best Regards >From aliuzhe@gmail.com