Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC87909C for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88899 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2012 07:38:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88571 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2012 07:38:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88543 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2012 07:38:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:38:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aoo.zhaoshzh@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:38:47 +0000 Received: by ggcy3 with SMTP id y3so3878109ggc.6 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:38:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IC76AVW93WtcuSR4eQgtuGJXBYf7aznPtyK/3+ZMl9s=; b=bTemBOW0uqMraEIbcNMBzbVipPcmJ3+MoOyKlL4X5yiBsKDUtI/M1jiWMpM/+qFRlK z1GysheVtOOIBQxbYtWfa32ABFlHduF7op5xV/RhA6ze+FcPJdHHea3xbCC2aDpLsLgu 2sCQzEzdf0HLnp0NC+iOg8DKLX/5Sgh5TPpvJ2U1VVAbtDmcGlyQE7h/FKuXOEpzOdHg D1k7gydl4kl6xYuYIYTqpkWL0zUKEk28zWu8NxgGJ3BupzDsUoQzaYoVEJUweWYU+BI/ VfJnNw7Hz51tk2A75MyC8DOVmvR1pmRdOQn0FwQxvqklImQO6n0ua8GkkU8AoVlJxv0H qf7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.147.106 with SMTP id tj10mr1569479obb.71.1331883506184; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.10.102 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:38:26 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Is there any mistake in the feature of notes on ranges in writer? From: shzh zhao To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04446c5744b0a204bb574b99 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04446c5744b0a204bb574b99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hi, In the description of https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=94949 there was an item in the feature enchancement. - the planned notes on ranges for issue #5487 it will highlight the selection range for the added comment just ike MS office: I tested this function at the openoffice of ooo340m1(build:9586), the test result : the function does not work. but the status is " VERIFIED FIXED " in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=94949 Is there any mistake in the feature or the bugzilla? -- * *Regards, * *aoo.zhaoshzh@gmail.com --f46d04446c5744b0a204bb574b99--