Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D30CC99D5 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68533 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 13:43:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68432 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 13:43:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68424 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 13:43:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:43:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of homembit@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:43:08 +0000 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so519779wer.6 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:42:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BdIY9Vc1TSZSq7LmPb9PGQsD6bv0nMUIcsncI7jB3Yw=; b=psISuibxe4cvI5nf1TIuctkWIAPdk7iBtTvF0fGCSbDToD+iZp6z/e0exic5y8bFMa D+VJPEjT7hZKgEvOmSIImcQkTaL/9BD3I60LvSMUke8rDjPaaLmQa3yK4mKIr5aCSGNH oWCNIwYDftgirgv2h0qucHgYFoZbCWQyu2+WUt6LFKXzMQKPZQKUPfa+IKh7lNIaZKLw IeP4fQGzkYi1zVLqAgZJOdrwNfn71pGL/z0Rf5jKthK1W+/XZcQPU5d2IiKfuSkp/93s H93L4w/T95YgSozW/JFifMrsLqiAuOi2FkydqMFxmzOFXd6TjV58wrV4ELeIMXEQiXQu VpcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.154 with SMTP id m26mr9347353wei.91.1331646168112; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.9.79 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:42:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:42:47 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is any one here familiar with OpenOffice? From: Jomar Silva To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64654d11dbf04bb200855 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d64654d11dbf04bb200855 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't know what you guys think about it, but showing some numbers about ODF TC members contributing with the project can be useful too. Best, Jomar On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > I jest,of course. > > But seriously, there are some claiming that "all" of the > OpenOffice.org project went over to LibreOffice and that the Apache > has zero experience with this code base. I know this sounds crazy, > but how can we best refute that statement? > > Here's my idea: Respond to this note and tell me how many years > experience you have working with OpenOffice. This could be in any > capacity, as a coder, tester, documentation, marketing, forum > volunteer, whatever. Please count relevant work with related > projects, such as Symphony, BSD ports, OOo4Kids, ODF, etc. as well. > How many years were you doing this before the project came to Apache? > > If I get a good number of responses I'll put together an infographic on > this. > > Regards, > > -Rob > --0016e6d64654d11dbf04bb200855--