Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simon@webmink.com designates
 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: Clarifying facts
From: Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com>
In-Reply-To: <1331674124.90242.YahooMailClassic@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:35:18 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8F12F981-B512-4832-ADBD-5F4CD1FD2783@webmink.com>
References: <1331674124.90242.YahooMailClassic@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org


On 13 Mar 2012, at 21:28, Pedro Giffuni wrote:

>=20
>=20
> --- Mar 13/3/12, eric b <eric.bachard@free.fr> ha scritto:
>=20
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> Could we remove the LibreOffice link from the main page ?
>> (e.g. just put the name of the derivated software) ?
>>=20
> +1
>=20
> Simon added the mention to libreoffice,

I felt it was appropriate in context, yes. Pretending it doesn't exist =
is unrealistic. Including it helps the general user and establishes our =
credibility.

> and he removed my line explaining that Oracle had chosen to given the =
project to a Foundation with the governance and credibility to maintain =
it (Apache).

I replaced your rather long and subjective statement with something =
simpler and objective, yes. No reflection on the content, it just isn't =
appropriate to the document. We all know about Apache's strengths.

S.