Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29F18930E for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56376 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2012 16:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56309 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2012 16:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56299 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2012 16:07:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:07:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 98.139.52.221 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com) Received: from [98.139.52.221] (HELO nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:07:04 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.191] by nm24.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2012 16:06:43 -0000 Received: from [68.142.200.226] by tm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2012 16:06:43 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.116] by t7.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2012 16:06:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Mar 2012 16:06:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 236294.77495.bm@omp1021.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 83627 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2012 16:06:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1332518803; bh=Y2mfNB5RAb2PvNjx5A9CGTJyRRDqaqP0a9pLfHFPE7Q=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y2YKhOI6W1NJRNgi3qEVuiOZ9wPtSQTmiaQfGihRgcngDxt7zW+9TLVnj0lvyMCJkhEBgRbQ6vQ9ix0eanmOE/khPk/CyZUJSWm5YBvwr0Vwx0OmkUejn/RAwcXdl1PLB6hHnxak9FVUCiTbEEtmjGFkZzK3Th6tYCwvLcRsBXw= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: lCuv38MVM1nBkE8w51s503q4NqAFt0tapmuYREPUAkai0bC OVGOIBbKinoBmafQQKisNWXB0SPcUJUXvReVd7fX4hOIiAGRC9b.KMgUzwNk v0sQThfs4pUcBLAM5_tpx4ypndToDDJOzfrYbFvScBG4T9vVkUJq9vG6ih7k KkoAdVMMlf3oumF63Qj8LjsjhMvYO7FaoAmOi1VuRfV_PzMrBb2qZWzpruvz uWY7gQtgJqIw02xkIlEtSuiUNBvZoTci7tx_urslrd6Wbr2T.U_czzyaq29z wwGPnsQC2Avm3QbNgu6TdtIDMr9rTybjM9XAnWO9od3hFSHmw6C1DvnhOQf1 9ZWVkFAPm0c161v970XNpoSSt.hX4tlxX8zjJ5bupnzz3zyHIv3LfkTZI3ZA GYyiq0YkxjNBpz6ePRin19lw8_kP7MvtYLFt6lg9BlQMlhv31IFnmZJFcJOF qe844dqY3rt1AVGhoQS3xyu9RbzboNiC7uq.RWbPZu60- X-Yahoo-SMTP: dHt73eiswBAYjuZ6oL.TTjbe.KQkAIve Received: from [192.168.1.101] (kay.schenk@68.127.48.248 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2012 09:06:42 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4F6C9EC7.1020905@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:03:19 -0700 From: Kay Schenk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120215 SUSE/3.1.19 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Google Analytics on download.openoffice.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/21/2012 07:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > I'd like to enable Google Analytics on our download page. > > This would allow us to collect some important data, such as the > geographical distribution of download requests. This information has > been sought for 3.4 mirror distribution planning. It can also provide > continuity of our download statistics which we would otherwise lose > when moving off of MirrorBrain. > > Of course, if some else is willing to implement an alternative way of > collecting this info, then I'd love it hear it. But I think GA is the > most direct method. > > Lazy consensus, 72 hours, etc. > > -Rob This sounds fine with me. Yes, we should state our privacy policy on use, and at some point, if you do produce a public report, maybe nix IP addresses if that's a concern. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MzK "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." -- Robert Heinlein