Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw
 designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4F649A7F.8030108@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:06:55 +0800
From: imacat <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120207 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache OpenOffice Developers <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: AOO for Debian
References: 
 <CAP-ksoiL8YsmiF5-Hm6GP87WL6e6GDrNVcZLND13pf_bD2ceow@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F612A75.1050603@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
	<08F96BCB-53C8-4BAE-A8CD-8255AE43A36A@free.fr>	<4F62033A.5080308@apache.org>
	<25B690E4-39C9-42FA-9C50-453FE7E2C7ED@free.fr>
	<CAC=mJXeaiov3v9UHb8f14dVq1vuv-r-pJ-bn_0juUSnd35f+pg@mail.gmail.com>
	<A145DEB1-555F-4E19-85A8-EF718F665649@jaguNET.com>
	<4F62D8FC.9070508@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
	<CAC=mJXeuJJmB4OxTxDNYZn_P+qU=RR7ztVqPLWf3ZM7OAoYQ_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F63A87E.4090609@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
 <CAP-ksoi094gSU7cQLv2thy9vhbgaGgV6WKWStX4yk=OJc3B9aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksoi094gSU7cQLv2thy9vhbgaGgV6WKWStX4yk=OJc3B9aw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig87120888E272E117B1200498"

--------------enig87120888E272E117B1200498
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012/03/17 11:20, Rob Weir said:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:54 PM, imacat <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw> wro=
te:
>>    I talked to a DD for hours.  He said I and Eric were wrong to talk
>> on debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org.  I should have talked to him
>> before I did that.  I should find another DD sponsor in the beginning,=

>> try to package AOO and OOo4Kids well and have that sponsor checked OK,=

>> and just *boom* the ready AOO and OOo4Kids package into Debian.
>>    Dear Rod:  To answer your question:  Yes, people does not go to OOo=

>> or LO package maintainers for Gnumeric or Abiword.  That's too stupid.=

>> They are rival projects, and those rival DD simply says NO.  KDE
>> maintainers says NO to GNOME, and vice versa.  People finds other
>> sponsors to submit these packages, and that's how they coexist.
> So it sounds like the DD's are the "gatekeepers", and if we make them
> happy, then we will have success.   So we need to find a DD who will
> help us.

    Actually, I'm thinking about something different.  We shall have
some DD+PMCs that work for both projects, just like these DD+TDFs.  Of
course, we still need some friendly DDs to bring us in.  It takes time
to become a DD, but luckily we still have some (at least unlike our 3.4
release schedule).

--=20
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc

<<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/


--------------enig87120888E272E117B1200498
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9kmn8ACgkQi9gubzC5S1w/dQCbBArpyMhWYgRlfECRTOvBtzEj
fiEAn3KpGg1nPd/3+tQfOEFesQzGFaQm
=CCjt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig87120888E272E117B1200498--