Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5FD891E6 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3754 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 16:38:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3626 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 16:38:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3618 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 16:38:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:38:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:38:46 +0000 Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so637394bkc.6 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:38:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6qp+OEkJ0W2jzyCSv0waGws1gH6d8NwAb/GNuEy4pEw=; b=W9w5sO2vZI3ZoXAeI+oshcl/RQHIIH5tbKzThxNp1ZoM8hD99ZeyBoY3YWxwK/aWy2 9r0zDXZy2ngrSFDhPxuqfr4eTUbiguqLpNPyVu/tpzKNphfP6O/y4c5CQWEziUXyGN0G +n61byXKmLY0akxnQ66bonedbvEWORuEbRSAd1Y9ZgfC8NF130inyDlQH83Fjokkt5+W fGYBYLZrt/4JDJoZ5/+ui9WhBNJvhvLOlowrRmmD5OJmnIj5bEErxKoJP2iNVVYkusYD UZnFk0BBj+9yuMDfEzIdoSrXeF85UU2gdNVSi8a9TgLM+aMefExjxjNW9khRFMdsKxkq VZXw== Received: by 10.205.133.10 with SMTP id hw10mr6370584bkc.61.1331656706575; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.20] (deibp9eh1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm2621307bkb.8.2012.03.13.09.38.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5F7801.6030908@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:38:25 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarifying facts References: <9F766A37-80BF-464F-9B2C-21B4E80046B3@webmink.com> In-Reply-To: <9F766A37-80BF-464F-9B2C-21B4E80046B3@webmink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Simon, On 3/13/12 5:25 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > Hi all, > > Probably because of all the progress being made towards a v3.4 release, I have been getting an increasing number of enquiries about the status of Apache OpenOffice from a variety of sources. I'm attempting, in good faith, to maintain an objective status summary the Apache OpenOffice incubator project to report to these enquiries. > > I've had a commentator assert that the statements below are uninformed and made-up. I believe based on my observations all of the following statements to be true about the Apache project; can you let me know if they are not, please, so I can present a factual status of the project when asked? > The Apache OpenOffice project will be releasing a new binary under the new name "Apache OpenOffice" at some point soon, which will probably be numbered v3.4. > The release is being developed by a subset of the original developers augmented by others. > There have been no updates to OpenOffice.org binaries released for users since Oracle stopped development. > There will be no new versions of a binary program called OpenOffice.org released. > No downloads of OpenOffice.org containing bug fixes or security updates have been made available for end users since Oracle stopped development. > The Apache OpenOffice project now controls the original OpenOffice.org domain (via the ASF) and plans to use it for future promotion of the Apache OpenOffice project. > The Apache OpenOffice project is still in incubation and has not yet requested graduation to a TLP. > Thanks for your help with this. > I personally would very much appreciate if you simply guide this people to the ooo-dev mailing list directly to get first hand information. To be honest I think they can get much better information if they seek the dialog with the project directly and we know which information they will receive. You still say it in a way that I can't support and I think you simply don't want to accept the reality. Apache OpenOffice is OpenOffice. If you don't accept this fact I am really asking what your intention is? Regards Juergen PS: offline for the rest of the day and I am looking forward to a probably another annoying thread where I have already said enough now.