Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BAFB928A for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95356 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2012 23:54:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95276 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2012 23:54:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95267 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2012 23:54:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:54:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.186] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:54:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (host-78-145-10-100.as13285.net [78.145.10.100]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MK8bx-1S6c6L0wfl-001OpL; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:53:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4F59468C.3000304@akerbeltz.org> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:53:48 +0000 From: Michael Bauer Reply-To: fios@akerbeltz.org Organization: Akerbeltz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache OpenOffice Subject: [Translate] Users for Pootle Server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:o8L8x4BjK9HsWnt6pomZ2AHdift0rdomjANSbx/Jge2 Xwg9jk5Hn0N/nIiZZ1V+H+nTnOrxouDLT20lWuPwhRE7WQYnII QFHiyyyjfQMVdM+1HfUcDv6DZdC3L+B3t6kXT/vWfYZ4X2fU34 8P0j/C7Ire60+x5oQvwNMBHcOwx3aSSvoteFlzng2PnxaArm8q oAZLy2Z2ShQUd6Ch2IcIxPbq5aiD/PkZDhvgZY/etG7nNWtV5Q eRTIJWO7VFa+JrkFPNRWfRCMEdefGjO7iDML5GMqDNfweDG/nf 4T0EslAcI10EGAHhVPtQU9CitBGN/4ozKNc2fdvojVZS2GJgQX TTyA/UOxod6Rh+BUbDGU= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't think any community engagement will be too successful with the current setup. It may be that the setup has worked very well for Apache so far but looking at the list of projects (http://projects.apache.org/indexes/alpha.html) I can't really see anything that looks like a project that has a localization effort comparable to OO (admittely, I did not check them *all*). AOO seems to be quite different and has its own community history of localization if you will. Putting the two together the way they currently are feels very much like a square peg in a round hole. Michael > > I am sorry if this has already been discussed but I lost a few > messages... > > With the Pootle server on-line, I plan on calling on the pt_BR > community to revise and improve the Brazilian translation for AOO. > > User registration on Apache's Pootle server, however is manual so my > question is: how should we engage the community to assist in the > translation process? > > -- Roberto Salomon