Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 652F69025 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 15:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54098 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2012 15:46:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54049 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2012 15:46:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54041 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2012 15:46:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:46:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.90.252] (HELO nm22-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.90.252) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:46:29 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm22.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Mar 2012 15:46:08 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.40] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Mar 2012 15:46:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp108.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Mar 2012 15:46:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 711084.32464.bm@smtp108.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: _.mhoFMVM1kSvARbOIT4DxX2d1Twdmwbbc2RcCUN_2pZrD. QVbXZolLZGQxr5bxpAlXZIeC_a9D.r5SmynUlkDnkM30R7lsFNMBE8rG7q1V CnbO89SmO12SNKPWKdqL2kCyFqM3a64X4AnRpL5GxJ0A49W6UdtxyxndL5J5 MPTPmJuxjkiKDoLXrM_NOhqSmSmD4I9ed1b482TZ4aa1VZlsZSdzgupW9Bxh 2k4EQw4U10B_GP4ig6v.xcY7Viu0bBH.GADlFW7ez.NAoIIlq_iB9Z_EmDm1 Q6SOIukEBWcgmtDjBqkawjrwdeOMzBS95G8hJMa0_0EFwaWrUzQUWWXJgCmu YhscZoZzIPjY6mK0Ld0rJkYs2m0qh6YB9QsJb_snQJWb0KpySyKN8zOGN0h0 uaShXBPR.aeHsauscEzz90xBBMNkXIUD9N696ozXuj4O4YUG.K.vpc5zXKKl g24p865cuDQ0L0tRxrr24E5fgUu20T_3OtQ8ls9d8MFMBaZLWXgp9iqO2fuE M0c7Uiw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xcjD0guswBAZaPPIbxpWwLcp9Unf Received: from [192.168.10.103] (pfg@200.118.157.7 with plain) by smtp108.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Mar 2012 07:46:08 -0800 PST Message-ID: <4F538E3B.1020404@apache.org> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:46:03 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120226 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AOO Logo for FreeBSD References: <4F504620.2010409@apache.org> <4F5381CF.4050503@shanecurcuru.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5381CF.4050503@shanecurcuru.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Shane; On 03/04/12 09:53, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Is there a particular reason you're using a different font and layout > than the normal AOO logo? Has the FreeBSD port usually had a very > different logo than past OOO builds? > Mainly because I don't like the normal AOO logo and I wanted to try something different. Also it's sort of cool to use a font that is also under AL2. We had never used a customized logo but that was mainly because no one got to do it. I personally don't spend time on copylefted code and I wouldn't have felt any motivation to do anything like this for the previous OOo (or for LO). > I really like the license underneath, and the small daemon on the > corner, almost as if he's looking in to seeing what's happening here. > That's a great combination. > > - Shane > > P.S. Personally, I don't like the font: too heavy and mushy looking, > especially (I bet) at smaller resolutions - but you really don't need > to listen to me on that kind of issue, since you're doing the work! > Thanks! > Welcome :). I had already did some minor modifications to the license font but for the time being the idea is to use this as a replacement for intro.png, (that and about.png can be specified with "configure"). I am not yet considering this for smaller images. Thanks for the feedback! Pedro. > On 2012-03-01 11:01 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> I am giving a thought on a new logo for use with FreeBSD's >> port. Here is a WIP: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~pfg/images/ApacheOO-BSD.png >> >> The idea is to use a modern logo and give a little more strength >> to the fact that we are using the new license. It would also be >> good to use the concept of a feather like the classic pen but >> that's a little tough at this time. I also kept the small BSD >> daemon separated on purpose so that there is no >> confusion. >> >> All the fonts used are under AL2 (droid), no daemons or any >> form of dead or undead creatures were harmed during the >> making of this logo. >> >> Opinions? >> >> cheers, >> >> Pedro.