Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30A2F99DB for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77724 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 17:20:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77604 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 17:20:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77596 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2012 17:20:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:20:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.120.142.151] (HELO mail1.mail.iol.ie) (193.120.142.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:20:18 +0000 Received: from (100AkerWood) [109.78.30.174] by mail1.mail.iol.ie with smtp id 1SCDaH-0007or-W7; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:19:58 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:19:56 +0100 From: Rory O'Farrell To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: why i uninstalled OpenOffice and went back to MS Office2003 Message-Id: <20120326181956.2c14c0cefce0801a323cf84d@iol.ie> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:54:19 -0400 Donald Whytock wrote: > Try MS Office 2010. Takes 5+ seconds for me. >=20 > That means OOo is less too-slow than MSO has evolved to. >=20 > Perhaps AOO should try to catch up? >=20 > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Martin T=F5numaa > wrote: > > Hi > > here=B4s my feedback to OpenOffice software that was available > > in March 2012 on openoffice.org > > You software is too slow. I have an XLS spreadsheet that i > > want to edit. With Openoffice, it loads 3-4 seconds, with MS > > Office 2003 it takes 0,5 sec. Opening speeds can certainly vary with different extensions loaded. I cannot speak about Calc as I don't use it for much other than very simple lists and calculation, but I noticed that a large document under Writer takes 20-30 seconds to open when Language Tool is installed, whereas without Language Tool it opens nearly instantly. I regard this as a reasonable trade off - I can remember working on documents with pen and ink, and later with a manual typewriter; any word processor is preferable.=20 --=20 Rory O'Farrell