Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E08E29950 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28286 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 21:58:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28229 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2012 21:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28221 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2012 21:58:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:58:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.120.142.151] (HELO mail1.mail.iol.ie) (193.120.142.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:58:22 +0000 Received: from (100AkerWood) [109.78.37.91] by mail1.mail.iol.ie with smtp id 1S7ZjF-0001Di-9g; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:58:01 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:58:00 +0000 From: Rory O'Farrell To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice Credits? Message-Id: <20120313215800.276310fd42a46499e9f3cc0d@iol.ie> In-Reply-To: References: <4F5FBB30.6030908@apache.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:52:43 -0400 Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Raphael Bircher > wrote: > > Am 13.03.12 22:18, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> The "about" box in the dev snapshots says: > >> > >> "Apache OpenOffice acknowledges all community members, > >> especially those mentioned at > >> http://www.openoffice.org/welcome/credits.html" > >> > >> But that page has not been updated. > >> > >> Was this page just manually updated, or do we generate it > >> from some data file? > >> > >> What criteria do we use for inclusion? > > As I know, this is only a list of people who field a SCA (Sun > > Copyright Agreement) but I'm not 100% sure. I'm not there for > > exemple. > >> >=20 > So what do we have for AOO? >=20 > - We have a list of committers >=20 > - We have another list of people who have signed ICLAs and > indicated they were interested in AOO. >=20 > - We have a list of everyone who has committed to Subversion. > This is a subset of the committers. Due to our use of > Subversion, any patch by a 3rd party would need to be applied > and committed via a committer. >=20 > - We have a list of everyone who as contributed bug reports >=20 > - We have a list of forum volunteers >=20 > - We have a list of everyone who as contributed to maintaining > the website, the wikis, etc., both project members and Apache > Infra (and now Source Forge as well) >=20 > - We have a list of everyone who subscribes or posts to the > mailing lists >=20 > So it takes a lot of people to make a project like this succeed. > Listing them all would be great. Trying to list them all, but > failing, would risk offending those that we leave out. >=20 > So I think my emerging preference is to list everyone, or to > list no one, but make a generic statement thanking the "many > volunteers who have made this release possible" or similar. >=20 > -Rob >=20 >=20 > >> Do we want to make a page for "legacy" contributors and then > >> have the main page be for "current" ones? > >> > >> I'm not proposing any particular solution. =A0I'm just noting > >> that the current stale data probably pleases no few of us. > >> > >> -Rob > > >=20 A list of specific contributors will almost certainly _always_ be wrong and need to much maintenance to maintain (even though wrong!), so a general statement thanking the many who have contributed to this project in any way seems most appropriate. --=20 Rory O'Farrell